论批评话语分析被引量：46

Critical Discourse Analysis

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文论述了批评话语分析的基本理论 ,原则和方法。批评话语分析的出发点是对语言和话语本质的重新认识 :语言不是中立客观地再现真实的手段 ,语言和话语的有效建构 ,调节并控制知识 ,社会关系和机构。本文分析了话语、权利和意识形态之间的关系 ,通过语言实例从几个方面讨论了批评话语分析的语言机制和方法。 The present article offers a study of the theoretical principles and analytic methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). CDA takes as its point of departure that language and discourse are not transparent, objective or neutral means for representing truth or reality. Rather, they effectively construct, regulate and control knowledge, social relations and institutions. This paper examines the discourse/power/ideology nexus and through the analysis of some textual samples, it discusses the analytic methods of CDA in terms of linguistic devices and shows how CDA can contribute to our understanding of power relations and ideological processes in discourse. The article concludes with a brief discussion of some implications of CDA and the importance of the general raising of critical language awareness.

作者吴建刚

机构地区华中师范大学外国语学院

出处《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第3期42-48,共7页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

关键词批评话语分析权力意识形态社会建构语言机构 Critical Discourse Analysis power ideology social construction linguistic devices

分类号 H0-05 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1N, Fairclough. Discourse and Text: linguistic and intertextual analysis [J], Discourse & Society, 3 (2).Sage Publications, 1992.
2T, N, Htckin. Criticai Discourse Analysis[A], http://www. exchanges.state.gov/education/engteaching/pubs/BR/functionalsec 3- 6. htm.
3VanDijk. Critical Discourse Analysis[M]. 1998, http ://www. hum. uva.nl/-teun/cda. htm.
4A, Luke. Theory and Practice in Critical Discours Analysis[J]. http://www. gseis. ucla. edu/courses./ed25 3a/ Loke/SAHA 6. htm.
5N. Fainlough/R Wodak . Critical Discourse Analysis[A]. Van Dijk (eds.): Discourse as Social Interaction:A Multdisciplinary Introduction[C]. Volume2. London, 1997.
6V, Dijk, Ideology and discourse A Muhidisciplinary Introduction[M], http://www. hum. uva. nl/teun/ideo -cis2. htm.
7B, Yousman. Who owns Identity? Malcolm X, Representation, and the Struggle Over Meaning [J].Communication Quarterly 49(1). Eastern Communication Association, 2001.
8J, DulLe. The Question of Truth and Apologetics in a Modern/Postmodern World [J ]. http ://www. apostolic. net/biblicalstudies/apologetics. htm.
9S, Mozrach, The Project of the Sociology of knowing and Cognitive Anthropology [J], http ://www.eff.org/Net- culture/Consciousness/knowing -knowing, article.
10M. Klages.Postmodernism[J].http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/pomo.html.