《经传释词》“所”释发疑

Query to the annotation of "suo" in"the Annotation of classical works and commentary

《经传释词》把“所”解释为“若”、为“可” ,如果仅从句法功能角度考察 ,结论自然正确 ,如果从篇章功能角度考虑 ,则还有很多不妥之处。并且认为 ,《经传释词》解释为“若”、“可”的“所” ,都可以用泛指指示代词来解释 ,它不仅具有句法上的功能 。

The interpretation of'suo' as'ruo' or 'ke' in 'the annotation of classical works and commentary' is sound in terms of syntactic function,but not so satisfactory in terms of textual function, so the paper holds the view that the word 'suo' can be interpreted as demonstrative pronoun with generic reference.It not only functions syntactically but also textually and indicates the semantic anaphora and thematic structure.