期刊文献+

大学英语等级考试的信度与效度测试 :英语四、六级与有效交际能力(英文)

TESTING THE TEST: CET AND COMMUNICATIVE VALIDITY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于大学英语四、六级 ,及其英语口语考试 ,是否具有科学的信度与效度这一问题的论证 ,引起了诸多争议。运用CarlPopper的反证法 ,在怀疑并否定其具有科学信度与效度方面 ,也不乏许多挑战权威的例子。尽管现今反证的理论与例证并不十分系统 ,但它终将会以科学的信度与效度为目标而日臻完善。 Claims of scientific validation for the CET and SET invite what Sir Carl Popper called 'disproofs.' Though not systematic, a large number of disproof s of a 'scientific' theory are essential to progress and should be the aim of real science. Such disproofs are marshaled from many sources.
出处 《成都信息工程学院学报》 2002年第2期138-148,共11页 Journal of Chengdu University of Information Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1]Dresser Norinne, International Manners[J].Wiley N.Y.1996, (43).
  • 2[2]Kohn, Alfie, Education Week[J].2001, 20, (4):60.
  • 3[3]Lillian Reza.Archived Question Site of International English Language Testing Service [EB/OL].http://www.english-net.com/ieltsdisc/.2001-03-15
  • 4[4]TFELChina.Archived postings[EB/OL].http://groups.yahoo.com/groups.TEFLChina/messages/ .
  • 5[5]Walfish, Daniel, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Chinese Applicants to U.S.Universities Often Resort to Shortcuts or Dishonest[M].2001: 4.
  • 6[6]Widdowson, Hery, quoted in G.Wilson tucker.Precision and Simplicity: Perspectives on TESOL and Art[J].Journal of Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 2000, 5:4.
  • 7[7]Xu Ping.Benefiting from Both the Communicative and Traditional Chinese Methods in Teaching English[M].Teaching English in China, 1999.
  • 8陈国崇.如何烧开英语教学这壶温水[J].外语界,1999(2):26-29. 被引量:14
  • 9金艳.大学英语四、六级考试口语考试对教学的反拨作用[J].外语界,2000(4):56-61. 被引量:198
  • 10杨惠中.大学英语四、六级考试回顾与展望[J].外语界,1998(3):28-32. 被引量:43

二级参考文献1

  • 1Bachman L F & Palun A S. Language Testing In Practice [M]. Oxford University Press, 1996.

共引文献370

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部