摘要
欧洲思想家主要对中国的专制主义制度及其刑罚、法律与道德的结合、中国衰落的原因进行了分析。尽管认识对象相同 ,但其所持观点和得出的结论又使他们分成两派。批判派认为中国政府的形式必然是专制主义 ,把法律与道德混在一起是极大的错误 ;辩护派则坚持与任何其他政府相比中国更接近于理想模式 ,中国人正是依靠道德政治获得了成功。需要注意的是 。
The European thinkers mainly made their analysis on Chinese dictatorial system, its combination of punishments, laws and ethics, and the reason of Chinas decline. Despite their different cognition object was identical, the viewpoints those thinkers held and the conclusion they came up with have distinguished them into two schools of thoughts. The critical school argued that the governments in China were no doubt in the form of dictatorship and it was a great mistake for them to mix laws with virtue, while the defending school argued that compared with other governments, China was much closer to the ideal model and Chinese people reached their success depending right on their virtues. What needs our attention is that those thinkers spontaneously pointed out that the lack of individuality freedom resulted in Chinas tragic drop out.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第4期91-97,共7页
Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词
欧洲思想家
中国
法律文化
专制主义
道德政治
European thinkers
China
legal culture
authoritarianism
moral politics