期刊文献+

巨额财产来源不明罪新探

Research on Huge Amount of Unclear Properties Offense
下载PDF
导出
摘要 巨额财产来源不明罪系反腐法网的重要环节 ,实施好坏直接关涉腐败的控制效果。当前学界对本罪构成要件、证据责任等问题的认识不一 ,大大影响了立法的应用价值。其实 ,我国《刑法》第 395条第 1款是实体法与证据法融为一体、规范中无罪过无行为的状态犯的新型立法模式 ,理论注释应有别于普通罪行。构成要件包括肯定和否定两个层次 ,即国家工作人员的财产与支出之和同合法收入存在巨大差额 ;本人不能说明来源的合法性。控辨双方分担证据责任 ,其中肯定性要件由控方承担 。 Item 1 of article 395 of the Criminal Law plays an important role in anti-corruption action.But now scholars have different views over the elements of the offense and the responsibility of the proof,which has greatly undermined the application value of legislation.Actually, the item is a new type code which integrates substantial law with evidence rule and creates a status offense without conduct or fault in view of norm. Therefore, we should interpret it in a particular way. There are two levels of this crime.One is the case that the public servant's property and expenditure exceed his legally earned income greatly and the other is that he can't provide reasonable explanations for the balance. The two parties all shoulder responsibility of proof. That is,the prosecutor bears the former and the defendant undertakes the later.
作者 邓斌
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2002年第2期53-56,共4页 Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 《刑法》 巨额财产来源不明罪 构成要件 证据责任 状态犯 huge amount of unclear properties offense elements of offense responsibility burden of proof status offense
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1赵秉志.关于“说不清合法来源”即可定罪的商榷[J].北京:法律学习与研究,1988,(5):32-32.
  • 2王勇.析非法得利罪[J].法学,1988(4):18-20. 被引量:1
  • 3冯亚东.试论刑法中的持有型犯罪[J].中国刑事法杂志,2000(1):23-26. 被引量:55
  • 4高铭喧.新编中国刑法学(下册)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998..
  • 5[日]大塚仁.犯罪论的基本问题[M].中译本.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993.26.
  • 6C·M·V·Clarkson,Criminal Law:Test and Materials, Sweet & Maxwell,1984,P80.
  • 7[英]J·C·史密斯.英国刑法[M].中译本.北京:法律出版社,2000.52.

二级参考文献17

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部