期刊文献+

《诗经》的政治解读与文学解读 被引量:2

Political And Literary Interpretation of The Book of Songs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从历史上来看 ,对《诗经》的解读方式共有过三种 ,即政治解读、历史解读和文学解读。政治解读是传统解读方式 ,体现了对现实政治的观照和积极入世的精神 ;历史解读是一种过渡 ,把“五经”当做历史典籍 ,但是并未真正与政治解读划清界限 ;文学解读是近现代以来的解读方式 ,体现了对人生与个性的重视 ,反映了对文学独立性的思考。政治解读与文学解读应该结合起来 ,从而更全面地解读《诗经》 。 Viewing from history, there are three ways to interpret The Book of Songs.Those are political interpretation, historical interpretation and literary interpretation. Political interpretation is a kind of traditional way, emboding the spirit of studying real politic and actively participating in society. Historical interpretation is the period of transition. In this period, people thought The Five Classics as historical books and records, but it did not separate them from political interpretation. Literary interpretation is a kind of way which was sprung up in modern times. It embodies that people attach importance to life and personality and reflects that people think over literature independently. Political interpretation should combine with literary interpretation in order to interpret The Book of Songs more comprehensively and form Chinese own literary research way.
作者 赵宗来
机构地区 济南大学文学院
出处 《延边大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第2期77-81,共5页 Journal of Yanbian University:Social Science Edition
关键词 《诗经》 历史解读 政治解读 文学解读 The Book of Songs Political interpretation historical interpretation literary interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[2]朱熹.诗集传[M].湖南:岳麓书社,1994.1-2.
  • 2.国语[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988..
  • 3[4]皮锡瑞.经学通论·诗经[M].北京:中华书局,1998.1.
  • 4[6]庞朴.儒学概论:第1卷[M].北京:东方出版中心,1997.224-225.
  • 5[2]现代汉语词典[Z].北京:商务印书馆,1978.
  • 6[8]鲁迅全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
  • 7[9]熊十力.读经示要[M].台北:台湾明文书局,1985.930.

共引文献36

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部