摘要
钟嵘《诗品·序》“永嘉时 ,贵黄老”之“黄老” ,学术界一般将其等同于道家学说。汪春泓先生另立新说 ,以为其所指乃无为而治的为政方略。实际上 ,从《诗品》自身 ,可知“永嘉”的时代断限存在明显的失误 ,难以作为立论的根据。而魏晋以降各家所用“黄老” ,亦多属道家或道教。因此 。
Academic circles always consider'learning about the emperor Huang and Lao Tzu' in 'worshipping learning about the emperor Huang and Lao Tzu in time of Yongjia' in Zhong Rong's Shipin to be identical with Taoism.Mr.Wang Chunhong set up a new theory by regarding its meaning as the policy of government by doing nothing that goes against nature.In reality,errors exist in Shipin itself about the definite time of 'Yongjia'.Therefore,it cannot be used as a basis for an argument.In addition,'learning about the emperor Huang and Lao Tzu' used by various schools after the Wei and Jin Dynasties usually belonged to Taoism.Therefore,it seems unnecessary to repudiate current views.
出处
《许昌师专学报》
2002年第3期32-35,共4页
Journal of Xuchang Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
关键词
《诗品》
永嘉
黄老
无为而治
Shipin
Yongjia
learning about the emperor Huang and Lao Tzu
government by doing nothing that goes against nature