摘要
目的 探讨年龄、性别因素在嗓音分析中的影响 ,比较区分与不区分年龄、性别在成年嗓音检测中对嗓音评价结果的差异。方法 使用美国泰亿格电子 (上海 )有限公司的Dr.Speech(4 .0版 )嗓音测试软件系统 ,利用系统默认的正常参考标准 (A标准 ,不分年龄、性别 )与我们早期的研究成果 (B标准 ,区别年龄、性别 )分别对 5 5 8例声带疾病患者进行嗓音评估 ,并对评估结果分析比较。结果 两标准对嗓音的评估程度不同 ,其差异具有一致性(P≤ 0 .0 0 1) ,并且与使用两种不同标准有中等程度的相关 (0 .4≤κ≤ 0 .8) ;使用B标准后 ,总体使嗓音评估程度在男性改变为 35 .5 2 % ,女性为 6 3.2 1% ,并且改变率的大小各组并不一致 :女性比男性的改变率大 ,女性中年组变化最大 ,男性中老年组变化最大 ;B标准比A标准总的嗓音评估检出率提高了 2 0 .5 2 %。结论 年龄、性别对临床嗓音客观分析有较大的影响 ,区分年龄、性别进行嗓音分析精确、细致 ;
Objective To explore the influence of age and sex to voice analysis, to compare the difference of voice assessment result in different age and sex groups.Methods The voice of 558 patients with vocal fold diseases was evaluated by voice assessment system Dr. Speech 4.0 software,The result was compared between normal standard value of system toleration (standard A, ie, not distinguishing age and sex) and our previous study (standard B, ie, distinguishing age and sex).Results The voice assessment level changesd 35.52% (male) and 63.21% (female) in collectivity using B normal standard, the varing rate was different in every group: the female varing rate was more than that in male, the most varing rate was middle-aged group in female and old-aged in male;The voice assessment positive examination rate increasesd 20.52% in B normal standard than A normal standard .Conclusion The age and sex influence the clinical objective voice assessment greatly, distinguishing age and sex in voice assessment is more strict and more delicate; We advise B normal standard as voice assessment reference value.
出处
《听力学及言语疾病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2002年第3期146-148,共3页
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology