期刊文献+

企业业绩评价方法选定的理论思考 被引量:6

Theoretic Thinking on the Selection of Evaluation Methods of Enterprise Achievements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前评价企业业绩的三种主要评价方法有其合理性也存在缺陷。通过运用代理理论对这些缺陷产生的根源进行剖析 ,可得出结论 :这三种方法产生缺陷的根源无法排除 ,因此其缺陷也无法克服 ; there are rationalities as well as shortcomings in the three evaluation methods that are used for assessing enterprise achievements. Analyzing the shortcomings of the methods with modern principal agent theory, we could make the following conclusion: the shortcomings of the evaluation methods cannot be eliminated because the causes of the shortcomings cannot be removed. The selection of the evaluation methods of enterprises is the game result between the principal and the agent.
作者 卫建国 陈烘
出处 《广东商学院学报》 2002年第3期72-76,共5页 Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
关键词 企业管理 业绩评价方法 代理理论 博弈分析 公司治理 经济增加值 平衡记分卡 enterprises management evaluation method principal agent theory game.
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献14

共引文献345

同被引文献28

  • 1任海云,曹建安.建立上市公司经营业绩评价指标体系的理论基础[J].商业研究,2005(20):41-44. 被引量:7
  • 2Tsui, A. S. A multiple-constituency framework of managerial reputational effectiveness [M]. In Hunt, J., Hosking, D.,Sehfiesheim, C. and Stewart, R. (Eds.), Leaders and mangers:International perspectives on managerial Behavior and leadership. New York:Pergamon Press, 1984,28-44.
  • 3Correa, H, A game theoretic analysis of teacher-student interaction,class size and achievement [J]. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis,1997,34:13-38.
  • 4Correa,Hector. A game theoretic analysis of faculty competition and academic standards. Higher Education Policy, 2001,14: 175-182.
  • 5Bernheim, B, Peleg, B. Whinston, M. Coalition-proof Nash equilibria.I. Concepts[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1987,42: 1-12.
  • 6Agrell, Per J. West, B Martin. A caveat on the measurement of productive efficiency [J]. Int. J. Production Economics, 2001,69: 1-14.
  • 7Tsui, Anne S. Milkovich, George T. Personnel department activities:constituency perspectives and preferences [J]. Personnel Psychology,1987,40(3):519-537.
  • 8Agrell,Per J.West,B Martin.A caveat onthe measurement of productive efficiency[J].Int.J.Production Economics,2001,69(1):1-14.
  • 9Tsui,Anne S.Milkovich,George T.Personnel department activities:Constituencyperspectives and preferences[J].Personnel Psychology,1987,40 (3):519-537.
  • 10Tsui,A.S.A Multiple-Constituency Model of Effectiveness:An Empirical Examination at theHuman Resource Subunit Level[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(3):458-483.

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部