摘要
历史学科是否适合用理论来进行研究?这是人文学科长期存在的争议问题之一。近期军事史和国家安全问题开始出现一种趋势,在战略文化的框架里进行验证研究。考察近十年来战略文化或近似课题的研究成果,包括有关中国或中国以外的研究个案,有关"人类暴力"、"文化现实主义"、"组织文化"、"持续对立"以及"规范与认同"等观点,近些年来受到特别的关注。这项考察显示了学者如何走出"理性取向"的局限性而开展研究的新思路。
It has been a longstanding issue in the humanities as to whether history exists in sheer antitheoretical realm or is congenial to study in theoretical way. Recent studies on military history and national security have nevertheless set to an ideational journey bound for substantiate their empirical findings under the framework of 'strategic culture'. This article provides a critique on selected literature of strategic culture and case studies in both the China and nonChina fields over the past decade. Scholarly works on human violence, cultural realism, organizational culture, enduring rivalry as well as norms and identity in national security receive particular attention. The critique demonstrates how scholars make great endeavours to transcend the parochialism of 'rational choice', thus opening up an exhilarating vista for further research.
出处
《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2002年第4期1-12,共12页
Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
ThisworkdescribedinthispaperwasfullysupportedbyagrantfromtheResearchGrantCounciloftheHongKongSpecialAdministrativeRegion.(Projectno.CUHK4311/00H)