摘要
巴赫金的社会符号学和洛特曼的结构文艺符号学是构成原苏联符号学王国的两根重要理论支柱 ,其理论影响引起了我国文艺学界和符号学界的普遍关注 ,但至今还主要是对他们理论的分别研究 ,尚未比较他们之间的理论特色和方法论特征。本文则力图比较巴赫金与洛特曼的符号学研究方法 ,探索他们如何从语言学和超语言学的不同途径 ,共同走向社会文化系统研究 ;揭示他们怎样打破二元对立的思维模式 ,构建多元共生的批评模式 。
Bakhtin's social semiotics and Lotman's structural literal semiotics are two important mainstays of the realm of semiotics in former Soviet Union.The influence of their theories has already gone beyond the border of their motherland and started to catch attention of literature and art circles and semiotics circles in our country.However,our studies mainly concentrated on their theories respectively,leaving the comparison of their theories characteristics and methodology features untouched.This thesis aims to compare the research methods of Bakhtin and Lotman's theories and probe into how they together made for the study of social culture systems through the different ways of linguistics and metalinguistics.It reveals the way they built the new critical pattern via a shift from dualism to pluralism.Accordingly,the thesis points out their contributions to the semiotics and the whole social humanities studies.
出处
《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第4期133-139,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)