期刊文献+

Performance Appraisal Method of Logistic Distribution for Fresh Agricultural Products 被引量:2

Performance Appraisal Method of Logistic Distribution for Fresh Agricultural Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Through the initial selection,screening and simplification,a set of performance appraisal system of logistic distribution suited to fresh agricultural products is established.In the process of establishing the appraisal indicator,the representative appraisal indicator of logistic distribution of fresh agricultural products is further obtained by delivering experts' survey and applying the ABC screening system.The distribution costs,transportation and service level belong to the first level indicator;packing fees,distribution processing fees,full-load ratio,haulage capacity,customer satisfaction and the strain capability of delivery personnel belong to second level indicator.At the same time,the weighing of each indicator is determined.The quantification is conducted on indicators.The qualitative indicators applies ten-point system and then coverts these indicators into percentage,that is the number between [0,1];as for the quantitative indicators,they are concluded to the interval [0,1] according to the actual value range of the indicators and by applying the grade of membership in the vague mathematics.Through the analyses of the advantages and disadvantages of the frequently used performance evaluation method and its applicable conditions,the comprehensive evaluation of logistic distribution of agricultural products obtained by using the method of fuzzy comprehensive appraisal.The results show that,in terms of reducing distribution costs,the packaging and distribution processing technology of fresh agricultural products should be improved,so as to reduce distribution costs.In the process of introducing the application of advanced technology,the high automatic logistic equipments should be introduced. Through the initial selection,screening and simplification,a set of performance appraisal system of logistic distribution suited to fresh agricultural products is established.In the process of establishing the appraisal indicator,the representative appraisal indicator of logistic distribution of fresh agricultural products is further obtained by delivering experts' survey and applying the ABC screening system.The distribution costs,transportation and service level belong to the first level indicator;packing fees,distribution processing fees,full-load ratio,haulage capacity,customer satisfaction and the strain capability of delivery personnel belong to second level indicator.At the same time,the weighing of each indicator is determined.The quantification is conducted on indicators.The qualitative indicators applies ten-point system and then coverts these indicators into percentage,that is the number between [0,1];as for the quantitative indicators,they are concluded to the interval [0,1] according to the actual value range of the indicators and by applying the grade of membership in the vague mathematics.Through the analyses of the advantages and disadvantages of the frequently used performance evaluation method and its applicable conditions,the comprehensive evaluation of logistic distribution of agricultural products obtained by using the method of fuzzy comprehensive appraisal.The results show that,in terms of reducing distribution costs,the packaging and distribution processing technology of fresh agricultural products should be improved,so as to reduce distribution costs.In the process of introducing the application of advanced technology,the high automatic logistic equipments should be introduced.
出处 《Asian Agricultural Research》 2010年第11期1-3,共3页 亚洲农业研究(英文)
关键词 LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION of FRESH AGRICULTURAL produc Logistic distribution of fresh agricultural products,Logistic distribution,Performance appraisal,Appraisal indicators,Fuzzy comprehensive appraisal,China
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1李洪兴.因素空间理论与知识表示的数学框架(Ⅶ)──多重目标综合决策[J].模糊系统与数学,1995,9(2):16-24. 被引量:26
  • 2陈梃.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.1-15.
  • 3Moore D L, Fearon H E. Computer-assisted Decision-making in Purchasing[J]. Journal of Purchasing, 1973, 9 (4): 5-25.
  • 4Gaballa A A. Minimum Cost Allocation of Tenders [ J]. Operational Research Quarterly, 1974, 25 (3): 389- 398.
  • 5Anthony F P. A Goal Programming Model for Purchase Planning[ J ]. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1983, 19 (3): 27- 34.
  • 6Ghodsypour S H, O' Brien C. A Decision Support System for Supplier .Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming[J]. Int. J. Production Economics, 1998, (56-57): 199-212.
  • 7Deng H. Inter-company comparison Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights[J]. Computers and Operational Research, 2000,(27): 963-973.
  • 8Parkan C. Decision-making and Performance Measurement Models with Applications to Robot Selection[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1999, (36) : 503 - 523.
  • 9陈志祥,马士华,王一凡.用户满意度评价模型及实证分析[J].系统工程,1999,17(3):43-49. 被引量:24
  • 10江传旭.我国发展物流系统的必要性及对策[J].物流技术,1999,18(3):33-35. 被引量:4

共引文献77

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部