摘要
从现存《伤寒论》早期传本以及历代治仲景学之名家对“相搏”的注解等方面 ,对“相搏”为“相”之讹误进行了考证 ,同时亦对其产生的原因作了相关分析。指出现行《伤寒论》诸本中之“相搏”多为“相”之讹误。建议中医学术界对此进行深入的研究考证。同时希望日后再版《伤寒论》及其各种注释本时 ,对各版本中之“相”
With careful textual research, the author points out the misnomer 'xiang bo', which was mistakenly taken from a similar term in Treatise on Febrile Disease . The authors call for further textual on this and suggests that compilers of new translation versions of Treatise on Febrile Disease be cautious in dealing with the medical term 'xiang bo.
出处
《南京中医药大学学报(社会科学版)》
2001年第4期190-192,共3页
Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition)
关键词
伤寒论
相搏
相Bao
考证
Treatise on Febrile Disease
Xiang bo
textual research