期刊文献+

两种不同麻醉方式对超促排卵下体外受精—胚胎移植术的影响 被引量:1

Effects of general and epidural anesthesia on reproductive outcome for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究不同麻醉方式对超促排卵下体外受精—胚胎移植术 (IVF-ET)的影响。方法 选择80例接受IVF-ET手术的患者 ,随机分为异丙酚/芬太尼静脉全麻组 (n=40)和硬膜外麻醉组 (n=40) ,比较两组患者的受精率、卵裂率和妊娠率等。结果 全麻组受精率、卵裂率、妊娠率分别为 (79.3±9.8) %、(82.5±16.6) %、37.5%与硬膜外组(78.9±19.1) %、(82.9±15.8) %、40.0%比较差别无显著性意义 (t=1.90、1.34,χ2=32.56,均P>0.05)。 结论 麻醉方式的不同并不影响IVF-ET的妊娠率。 Objective To compare the effects of two different anesthetic tehniques(general anesthesia versus epidural anesthesia) used for oocyte retrieval on reproductive outcome of in vitro fertilization_embryo transfer(IVF_ET) outcome.Methods Eighty patients were divided into general anesthesia group(40 cases) and epidural anesthesia group (40 cases) randomly.For general anesthesia we used a combination of propofol with fentanyl.The reproductive outcomes(fertilization,cleavage and pregnancy rates) of all patients were analysed.Results There were no significant differences of the fertilization,clevage and pregnancy rates between the two groups.Conclusion The two different anesthetic techniques didn't affect the outcome of the IVF_ET.
作者 黄晓燕 章岚
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2002年第7期400-401,410,共3页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 麻醉方式 超促排卵 体外受精 胚胎移植术 全麻 硬膜外麻醉 IVF_ET General anesthesia ural anesthesiaPregancy rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]Huang HW, Huang FJ, Kung FT, et al. Effects of induction anesthetic agents on outcome of reproductive technology: a comparison of propofol and thiopental sodium. Changgeng YI Xue Za Zhi, 2000, 23(9): 519.
  • 2[2]Kim WO, Kil HK, Koh SO, et al. Effects of general and locoregional anesthesia on reproductive outcome for in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis. J Korean Med Sci, 2000, 15(1): 72.
  • 3[3]Christiaens F, Janssenswillen C, Van Steirteghem AC, et al. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology performance after oocyte retrieval under general anaesthesia(propofol) versus paracervical local anaesthetic block: a case-controlled study. Hum Reprod, 1998, 13(9): 2460.
  • 4[4]Hammadeh ME, Wilhelm W, Huppert A, et al. Effects of general anaesthesia vs. Sedation on fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in an IVF program. Arch Gyneov, 2001, 263: 59.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部