屈原“放逐”问题证辩

Arguments on the Issue of Quyuan “Being Exiled”

屈原放逐问题的研究,是屈原生平研究的一个热点和难点。由于司马迁《史记》先后涉及到“疏”、“绌”、“放流”、“迁”、“放”等,学术界对此颇多异辞。近现代的研究,主要是在王逸、黄文焕、林云铭、蒋骥的基础上,作局部的调整或发挥,他们共同的前提是:屈原在郢都任职、遭谗、被疏;在汉北生活了一段时间;被流放江南。屈原放逐问题研究,在方法论上最大的误区是循环论证。鉴于条件,目前可以适当模糊一些、概括一些。

The investigation of Quyuan 'being exiled' is a difficult point at issue in researching into Quyuan's life. Different terms used in Shi Ji (Historical Records) by Si Maqian such as 'disfavored', 'demoted', 'disposed', 'exiled', and 'banished' give rise to various hypotheses about his exile. Most of modern or temporary researches of the event are adjusted or exerted work of Wang Yi, Huang Wenhuan, Lin Yunming, and Jiang Ji. Their common premise is Quyuan holding a pose, slandered, and disfavored in Yingdu; living for a period of time in Hanbei; and exiled in the south of the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. The biggest error in the research into the issue of Quyuan ' Being Exiled' is circular argumentation. In view of present conditions, it is advocated that the research be general and fuzzily controlled to an appropriate extent.