期刊文献+

中药学专业《药理学》期末考试试卷分析与评价 被引量:1

Analysis and assessment of pharmacological test paper for year 2010 students majoring in pharmaceutical professional
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解中药专业学生对《药理学》课程的学习情况及教师在教学过程中是否达到预期的教学目标,为提高《药理学》教学质量提供可靠数据依据。方法:通过分析软件对广西中医药大学药学院2010级中药学专业162名学生的《药理学》期考试卷进行难度和区分度分析。结果:该份试卷共66题,其中客观题和主观题比例为3.125∶1,客观题和主观题的分值比例为1∶1,平均成绩为75.10分,标准差为10.84,最低分32分,最高分96分,极差为64分,难度系数为0.75,区分度为0.26。结论:本试卷难度适中,区分度尚可。 To find the problems in teaching and learning to improving teaching quality by analyzing pharmacological test paper of year 2010 students. Methods:The 164 students (2 were absent), final test paper of 2010 majoring in pharmaceutical professional had been analyzed. Statistical software was used to analyze the difficulty of questions paper and discrimination. Result:The paper includes a total of 66 questions. The ratio and the score proportion of questions for objective and subjection was 3.125:1 and 1:1 respectively. The average score was 75.10, standard deviation was 10.84, the lowest score was 32, the highest score was 96, full pitch was 64 points, the difficulty and differentiation degree was 0.75 and 0.26 respectively. Conclusion:The difficulty and differentiation degree of this paper were moderate. It accorded with the requirement of teaching program.
作者 杨柯
机构地区 广西中医药大学
出处 《大众科技》 2014年第6期172-174,共3页 Popular Science & Technology
基金 广西壮族自治区教育厅广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(JGY2014086)
关键词 药理学 试卷分析 中药学专业 Pharmacology analysis and assessment of final test paper pharmaceutical professional
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

  • 1[1]教育部[2001]4号文件.关于加强高等学校本科教学工作,提高教学质量的若干意见[Z].2001.
  • 2[2]重庆交通学院关于实施双语教学暂行管理办法[Z].
  • 3[3]柯惠新,等.调查研究中的统计分析方法[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,1999.

共引文献82

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部