期刊文献+

国际制度中的认同因素分析——以“跨大西洋安全共同体”的建构为例

An Analysis of National Identity Factor in the International Institutions——Taking the Transatlantic Security Community as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认同是影响国家参与国际社会活动的重要因素之一,尤其是在国家参与国际制度的进程中,认同与制度化构成一个互动的关系。从认同的角度来看,正向的国家间认同为制度化的发展打下良好基础;从制度的角度来看,国际制度为国家认同的塑造提供平台,高级制度化往往伴随着一个国家内化规范及认同建构的过程。二战后,欧美安全关系的发展就是一个认同与制度化良好互动的典型例证。双方在良好认同的基础上开始制度化进程,而在国际制度基础上的国家间交往,则进一步加深二者对彼此的认知程度,改变它们对安全、权力、利益和主导规范的认知,推动欧美关系朝积极的方向发展,最终建立了一个稳定有效的"跨大西洋安全共同体"。 Identity is one of important factors for countries when participating the international communication,especially during the process of j oining in the international institutions.In this process,identity and institutionalization form an interactive relationship.From the view of i-dentity,positive national identity could lay a good foundation for the development of institu-tionalization.From the view of institution,international institutions could provide a platform for the development of common identity,which means institutionalization always contains a national internalized norms and identity construction process.After the World War Two,the development of European and American security relations is an example of positive interaction of identification and institutionalization.Based on a good basis,these two sides started the con-struction of institutionalization,while on the platform of international institutions,the devel-opment of transatlantic relations moved forward,which further deepened their cognition on each other,and changed their understanding for safety,power,interest and the leading norms. At the end,all of these factors together promoted the transatlantic relations to a positive direc-tion,and ultimately established a stable and effective “Transatlantic Security Community”.
作者 李海龙
出处 《金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第2期45-49,共5页 Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 认同 国际制度 跨大西洋安全共同体 identity international institutions Transatlantic Security Community
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Keohane Robert O. International Institutions: Two Approaches[J].International Studies Quarterly, 1988 (4) : 379 - 396.
  • 2亚历山大·温特.国际政治的社会理论[M].秦亚青,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
  • 3Carlsnaes W, Thomas Risse, Simmons B.Handbook of International Relations[M].London: Sage, 2006: 102.
  • 4Kratochwil Friedrich. History, Action and Identity Revisiting the "Second" Great Debate and Assessing its Importance for Social Theory[J]. European Journal of International Relations, 2006(1) : 5 - 29.
  • 5McCall George, Simmons J L. Identities and Interae- tions[M]. New York: Free Press, 1966:69.
  • 6Austin W G, Worchel Monteret S. The Social Psychol- ogy of Intergroup Relations[M]. Calif. Brooks/Cole, 1979:33 - 47.
  • 7Young Oran. Political Leadership and Regime Forma- tion: On the Development of Institutions in Inter- national Society[J]. International Organization, 1991 (3) : 281 - 308.
  • 8Slaughter Anne-Marie. International Law in a Word of Liberal States[J]. European Journal of International Law, 1995(1), 530- 538.
  • 9Sending Jacob Ole. Constitution, Choice and Change Problems with the "Logic of Appropriateness" and its Use in Constructivist Theory[J]. European Journal of International Relations, 2002(4) : 443 - 470.
  • 10阿米塔·阿查亚.建构安全共同体:东盟与地区秩序[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部