期刊文献+

地方GDP压力、地方国有企业产值操控与经济后果 被引量:11

GDP Pressure,SOE Output Manipulation,and Economic Consequences
原文传递
导出
摘要 财政分权体制和企业"规模效应"①导致地方政府更关心企业产值增长,投资拉动地方GDP最终也反映在相关企业的产值增长上。本文以中国上市公司(2009年-2012年的季度数据)为样本研究了地方政府干预地方国有企业进行产值操控的动因及其经济后果。研究结果发现:上季度地方GDP相对业绩与地方国有企业产值操控负相关;地方政府直接控制的公司更容易进行产值操控;GDP相对业绩对地方国有企业产值操控行为的影响并未因为政府控制方式的不同而有所差异;地方国有企业的产值操控对未来短中期的经营业绩产生不利影响。 This paper investigates the government's motivation to intervene local SOE output value and its economic consequences. Investment can improve GDP and it eventually is reflected in the local output value. Thus under the "fiscal decentrali- zation system" together with the "scale effect", the local government is concerned much more about local output. Using quarterly data of listed companies from 2009 to 2012, we research the relationship between local SOE output control and local GDP and the impact on firms' future performance. We find that when the performance of GDP is relatively poor, local SOE output value control is likely to be more severe. Furthermore, there is no significant difference between local government directly controlled SOEs and indirectly controlled SOEs, regarding how the performance of local GDP affects firm output value. Finally, the local SOE output value control will adversely affect the short term future operating performance.
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期38-48,共11页 China Economic Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目"金融危机背景下的企业风险--传导 预警机制与应急管理研究"(11BGL048) 2013年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"风险导向审计在中国资本市场的运用效果研究"(JBK1307137)和"货币政策与企业财务脆弱性互动机理研究"(JBK1307088)的资助
关键词 产值操控 政府干预 GDP压力 经济后果 output value control government intervention GDP pressure economic consequences
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Dechew, P. M., Kothari, S. P. 1998. The Relation between Earnings and Cash Flous[J].Journal of Accountion and E- conomics, 25(2) : 133-168.
  • 2Galal A. 1991. Public Enterprise Reform[ R]. World Bank Discussion Paper, 119.
  • 3Graham, J. R., Harvey C. R., et al. 2005. The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting[J]. Journal ofAccounting and Economics, 40( 1-3 ) : 3-73.
  • 4Gunny K. 2005. What are the Consequences of Real Earnings Management[ R]. Working Paper.
  • 5Gunny K. A. 2010. The Relation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Per- formance : Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27 (3) : 855-888.
  • 6Khanna T., Rivkin J. W, 2001. Estimating The Performance Effects Of Business Groups In Emerging Markets [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 22 ( 1 ) : 45-47.
  • 7Lazear E., Rosen S. 1981. Rank-Ordered Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts[ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5) : 841-864.
  • 8Roychowdhury S. 2006. Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation[J]. Journal of Accounting and E- conomics, 42 ( 3 ) : 335-370.
  • 9Shirley M., Walsh P. 2001. Public Versus Private Ownership:The Current State of the Debate[ R]. World Bank Work- ing Paper.
  • 10Taylor G. K., Xu R. Z. 2010. Consequences of Real Earnings Management on Subsequent Operating Performance[J]. Research in Accounting Regulation, 22 ( 2 ) : 128-132.

二级参考文献260

共引文献2476

同被引文献185

引证文献11

二级引证文献193

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部