期刊文献+

地佐辛与舒芬太尼用于直肠癌根治术后镇痛效果比较 被引量:4

Comparison of intravenous analgesia with dezocine and sufentanil after radical resection of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较地佐辛与舒芬太尼用于直肠癌根治术后的镇痛效果。方法:将60例直肠癌根治手术患者随机分为两组,D组予地佐辛0.7 mg/kg加生理盐水至60 mL,S组予舒芬太尼1.5μg/kg加生理盐水至60 mL,行静脉镇痛(PCA)治疗。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Ramsay镇静评分评估患者疼痛程度和镇静情况,同时记录不良反应的发生情况。结果:两组镇痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),D组镇静评分与不良反应发生率低于S组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:地佐辛可以安全有效地用于直肠癌术后镇痛。 Objective:To compare the efficacy of dezocine and sufentanil in patient intravenous analgesia after radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods:Sixty patients arranged for radical resection of rectal cancer were randomly divided into dezocine group(group D)and sufentanil group(group S). After operation two groups were respectively given by intravenous injection(PCA)were decozine 0. 7 mg/ kg(group D)and sufentanil 1. 5 μg/ kg(group S)which were diluted to 60 mL by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)and Ramsay scores after operation and adverse effects were recorded and compared. Results:There was no significant difference in the VAS scores(P ﹥ 0. 05). The Ramsay scores and adverse effects in group D were significantly lower than those in group S(P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion:The postoperative analgesia with dezocine can serve as a safe and effective method of analgesia in patient of radical rectal cancer.
机构地区 山西省肿瘤医院
出处 《临床医药实践》 2014年第7期493-495,共3页 Proceeding of Clinical Medicine
关键词 地佐辛 舒芬太尼 直肠癌 术后镇痛 dezocine sufentanil rectal cancer postoperative analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1O'Brien JJ,Benfield P.Dezocine.A preliminary review of its phar-macodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties,and therapeutic effi-cacy[J].Drugs,1989,38(2):226-248.
  • 2Locniskar A,Greenblatt DJ,Zinny MA.Pharmacokinetics of dezo-cine,a new analgesic:effect of dose and route of administration[J].Eur J Clin Pharmacol,1986,30(1):121-123.
  • 3Pandit UA,Kothary SP,Pandit SK.Intravenous dezocine for post-operative pain:a double-blind,placebo-controlled comparison withmorphine[J].J Clin Pharmacol,1986,26(4):275-280.
  • 4Cohen RI,Edwards WT,Kezer EA,et al.Serial intravenous dosesof dezocine,morphine,and nalbuphine in the management of post-operative pain for outpatients[J].Anesth Analg,1993,77(3):533-539.
  • 5Jasinski DR,Preston KL.Assessment of dezocine for morphme-hke-morphine-like subjective effects and miosis[J].Clin Pharmacol T-her,1985,38(5):544-548.
  • 6Moiniche S,Kehlet H,Dahl JB.A qualitative and quantitative sys-tematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief:the role of timing of analgesia[J].Anesthesiology,2002,96(3):725-741.
  • 7Dahl JB,Miniche S.Pre-emptive analgesia[J].Br Med Bull,2004,71:13-27.
  • 8Apfel C C, Roewer N.Risk assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].Int nesthesiol Clin, 2003, 41 ( 4 ) : 13-32.
  • 9Pierre S, Benais H, Pouymayou J.Apfel' s simplifiedscore may favourab|y predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].Can J Anesth, 2002, 4 ( 9 ) : 237-242.
  • 10Eberhart L H, Morin A M, Guber D, et al.Applicability of risk scores for postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults to paediatric patients[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 93 ( 3 ) : 386.

共引文献440

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部