期刊文献+

人际沟通中的语言偏向及影响因素 被引量:9

Linguistic Bias and Its Influencing Factors in Interpersonal Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言偏向是指因交流目标所属社会范畴不同而造成的语言使用差异。目前对语言偏向的研究主要集中在语言群际偏向(LIB)、语言期望偏向(LEB)以及否定偏向(NB)。对语言偏向的理论解释主要包括动机机制和认知机制。语言偏向受到沟通者的认知与刻板印象、情绪、人格特质、群体认同、沟通目标、沟通情境等因素的影响。拓展语言偏向的心理机制、类型与应用研究、创新研究方法以及开展汉语本土化研究是语言偏向研究的未来方向。 The linguistic bias can be defined as a systematic asymmetry in word choice as a function of the social category to which the target belong. Researches of linguistic bias mainly focus on linguistic intergroup bias (LIB), linguistic expectancy bias (LEB) and negation bias (NB). The theoretical explanations of linguistic bias include motivation mechanism and cognition mechanism. Cognition and stereotypes of communicator, mood, traits of personality, group identity, communicative purposes and other factors affect the linguistic bias in interpersonal communication. Expanding the researches of psychological mechanisms, types and applied researches, innovating the research methods, and making more localization studies in the Chinese context are the future research directions of linguistic bias.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期1188-1197,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD006) 教育部人文社科基金青年项目(13YJC190023 13YJC740110) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2013M531713)
关键词 语言偏向 人际沟通 否定偏向 动机与认知机制 刻板印象 linguistic bias interpersonal communication negation bias motivation and cognition mechanism stereotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1杜卫,闫春平,孙晓敏,张厚粲.语言的群体间偏差研究[J].心理科学,2009,32(1):106-109. 被引量:7
  • 2胡莹,朱小平.语用学理论与外语教学[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,36(1):143-147. 被引量:23
  • 3刘雪峰,张志学.认知闭合需要研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(1):51-55. 被引量:36
  • 4郝新星,邹长征,李静.网络语言的语言偏离分析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,11(S1):217-219. 被引量:8
  • 5Assilam6hou, Y., & Test6, B. (2013). The effects of linguistic abstraction on evaluations of the speaker in an intergroup context: Using the linguistic intergroup bias makes you a good group member. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 113-119.
  • 6Beukeboom, C. J. (2009). When words feel right: How affective expressions of listeners change a speaker's language use. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 747-756.
  • 7Beukeboom, C. J, & de Jong, E. M. (2008). When feelings speak how affective and proprioceptive cues change language abstraction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2), 110 122.
  • 8Beukeboom, C. J., Finkenauer, C., & Wigboldus, D. J. (2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 978-992.
  • 9Beukeboom, C. J., & Semin, G. R. (2006). How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 553-566.
  • 10Beukeboom, C. J., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2012). The language of extraversion: Extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(2), 191 201.

二级参考文献56

  • 1洪岗.英语语用能力调查及其对外语教学的启示[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(4):56-60. 被引量:357
  • 2Adrian, F., & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity. Current Psychology, 14, 179 - 190.
  • 3Adomo, T W., Frenkel-Bnmswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sandford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • 4Budner, S. A. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29 - 50.
  • 5Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 247 - 259.
  • 6de Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91,280 - 295.
  • 7de Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1993). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Soeial Psychology Bulletin, 25, 34 - 362.
  • 8De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Perro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346 - 365.
  • 9Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenverg, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schapter, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254 - 270.
  • 10Durrheim, K. & Foster, D. (1997). Tolerance of ambiguity as a content specific construct. Personality and Individual Difference, 22, 741 - 750.

共引文献70

同被引文献86

引证文献9

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部