期刊文献+

动态增强磁共振扫描与超声弹性成像对乳腺癌的诊断价值探讨 被引量:20

Research on the Values of the DCE-MRI and the UE on the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨动态增强磁共振成像扫描与超声弹性成像对乳腺癌良恶性肿瘤的诊断价值,为临床诊断提供影像学依据。方法:回顾性分析2009年10月至2013年5月在我院经穿刺或手术病理证实为乳腺癌的59例患者的临床资料,患者术前均行超声与动态增强MR检查。依据病理组织活检和临床随访分别评价动态增强MR和UE对乳腺癌诊断的准确性。结果:DCE-MRI检测共发现病灶59个,55个初步诊断乳腺恶性肿瘤(BI-RADS 4-5),4个诊断为良性(BI-RADS 3),诊断准确率为93.22%(55/59)。UE对59个病灶进行评分,54个评分为乳腺恶性肿瘤,5个评分为良性,诊断率为91.53%(54/59)。UE检测乳腺癌的敏感性明显低于DCE-MRI及DCE-MRI+UE,DCE-MRI检测乳腺癌的特异性明显低于UE及DCE-MRI+UE,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。DCE-MRI+UE诊断乳腺癌的准确率为96.61%(57/59),明显高于DCE-MRI或UE单独检测的准确率(P<0.05)。结论:动态增强MR诊断乳腺癌的敏感性较高,而超声弹性成像的特异性较好,两者联合可提高诊断准确率,对乳腺癌的早期诊断具有重要的临床应用价值。 Objective: To study the values of the dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans and the ultrasound elasticity on the diagnosis of the breast tumors in order to provide the basic imaging data for the clinical treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 59 patients with breast cancer who were confirmed by the clinical biopsy or pathology in our hospital between October 2009 and May 2015 was conducted. The patients all had the UE and the DCE-MRI inspection before the operation. According to the pathological biopsy and the clinical follow-ups, the diagnostic accuracy of the UE and DCE-MRI were evaluated and analyzed. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the DCE-MRI was 93.22%(55/59), That is, among the 59 leisions discovered, 55 of them were the malignant tumor(BI-RADS4-5) and another 4 were the benign ones(BI-RADS3); The diagnostic accuracy of the UE was 91.53%(54/59), which means there were 54 cases of malignant tumor(4 scores), and 5 benign one. The sensitivity of the UE was significantly lower than those of the DCE-MRI and DCE-MRI+UE, the specificity of DCE-MRI was significantly lower than those of the UE and DCE-MRI+UE(P〈0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI+UE was 96.61%(57/59) which was significantly higher than those of the DCE-MRI or UE(P〈0.05). Conclusion: The sensitivity of the DCE-MRI on the diagnosis of breast cancer was high, while the specificity of ultrasound elasticity on the diagnosis of breast cancer was better. It is suggested that the combination of the DCE-MRI and the UE could improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2014年第23期4507-4509,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(3087326)
关键词 乳腺癌 动态增强磁共振 超声弹性成像 诊断价值 Breast cancer Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Ultrasonic elastography Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1杨阳,张健,李爱东.早期乳腺癌的诊断及治疗进展[J].现代生物医学进展,2012,12(31):6166-6168. 被引量:16
  • 2Koolen BB, WV Vogel, MJ Vrancken Peeters, et al. Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET[J]. J Oncol, 2012, 2012: 438647.
  • 3Biglia N, Bounous YE, Martincich L, et al. Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(3): 199-204.
  • 4张艺军,刘明霞,唐志全,袁有法,张蕾.3.0T磁共振动态增强检查对乳腺癌的临床应用价值[J].现代生物医学进展,2009,9(9):1710-1712. 被引量:6
  • 5Schrading S, Schild H, KG hr M, et al. Effects of Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors on Breast Tissue Enhancement in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Breast MR Imaging: A Longitudinal Intraindividual Cohort Study[J]. Radiology, 2013,10: 131198.
  • 6Abe H, Schacht D, Kulkarni K, et al. Accuracy of axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients: an observer-performance study comparison of MRI and ultrasound[J]. Acad Radiol, 2013, 20(11): 1399-1404.
  • 7Ko ES, Han BK, Kim RB, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: Correlations with Tumor-Stroma Ratio[J]. Radiology, 2013, 21: 1310 73.
  • 8Selvan S, M Kavitha, SS Devi, et al. Fuzzy-based classification of breast lesions using ultrasound echography and elastography[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2012, 28(3): 159-167.
  • 9Dong H, Li Y, Li H, et al. Study of the Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2013,27. pii:SI526-8209(13)00306-6.
  • 10Noh JM, Han BK, Choi DH, et al. Association between BRCA Mutation Status, Pathological Findings, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Patients with Breast Cancer at Risk for the Mutation[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2013, 16(3): 308-314.

二级参考文献31

  • 1李明山,周玉荣,王丽,耿进朝,戴金汉.3D T_1WI动态增强成像诊断乳腺良恶性病变的价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2005,16(5):256-259. 被引量:9
  • 2罗建东,叶泳松,张雪林,石灵春.MRI三维动态增强减影技术鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(5):688-692. 被引量:40
  • 3Elizabeth A. Morris.Breast cancer imaging with MRI [J]. Radio Clin NAm, 2002,40:443-466
  • 4Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions[J]. Radiology, 1999,4:477-480
  • 5Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging [J ]. AJR,1997,169(2):417- 424
  • 6Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB, et al. Axillary lymph nodemetastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Eur Radiol, 2000,10:1464-1471
  • 7Kootstra J, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Rietman H, et al. Quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in stage I / II breast cancer patients:a prospective longitudinal study [J], Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15(9):2533-2541.
  • 8Ravdin PM, Cronin K.A, Howlader N, et al. The decrease in breast-can- cer ineidenee in 2003in the United States[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356 : 1670-1674.
  • 9Ford D, Easton DF. The genetics of breast and ovarian cancer [J]. Br J Cancer, 1995,72:805-812.
  • 10Baynes C, Healey CS, Pooley KA, et al. Common variants in the ATM, BRCA-1, BRCA-2, CHEK2 and TP53 cancer susceptibility genes are unlikely to increased breast cancer risk [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007, 9:R27.

共引文献20

同被引文献169

引证文献20

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部