期刊文献+

多模式交通网络路径动态调整模型 被引量:2

Route-swapping Dynamic Model on Multi-modal Traffic Network
下载PDF
导出
摘要 既有路径调整模型的研究载体是单模式网络,不能够刻画现实中多模式网络上出行者的路径调整行为.为此,本文提出采用比例延拓与绝对延拓两种方法来描述多模式网络中用户对不同出行方式的费用感知特性,并据此建立了多模式网络条件下的用户路径动态调整模型(Multi-modal Route-Swapping Dynamics,简称MRSD).研究发现:(1)MRSD能避免过度调整行为,并能维持解集不变性;(2)MRSD的稳定路径流模式与多模式网络用户均衡等价,且在其稳定状态,模式内部所有被使用的路径具有相同且最小的实际费用,模式之间所有被使用的路径之间存在(符合比例延拓或绝对延拓的)费用感知壁垒;(3)MRSD的所有解有界且收敛于多模式网络用户均衡. The research carrier of existing route-swapping models is the single mode traffic network. These models cannot describe travelers' route-swapping behaviors on actual multi-modal network. For this, this study suggests utilizing two methods, i.e., proportional expansion and absolute expansion, to capture travelers' cost perception psychology towards different travel modes on multi-modal network. The corresponding multi-modal route-swapping dynamic(MRSD) is developed. It is founded that: MRSD can avoid over swapping and maintain solution variance; The stationary path flow state of MRSD is equivalent to the multi-modal user equilibrium; at stationary path flow state, those used routes within the same mode have the same and minimum actual cost, while cost perception barrier exists between two utilized routes within different modes;All the solutions of MRSD are bounded and converge to the multi-modal user equilibrium.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期126-130,共5页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71131001) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB725403) 中央高校基本科研业务费(2012JBM073) 国家高技术研究发展计划(2011AA110303)
关键词 城市交通 日变路径调整行为 对向调整模型 多模式交通网络 感知费用 urban traffic day-to-day route-swapping behaviors pair-wise swapping model multi-modal traffic network perception cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Wading D , Hazehon M. The dynamics and equilibria of day-to-day assignment models[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2003, 3(3): 349 - 370.
  • 2Smith M J. The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment: an application of a method of Lyapunov[J]. Transportation Science, 1984, 18 (3): 259 - 304.
  • 3Yang F ,Zhang D. Day-to-day stationary link flow pat- tern[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2009, 43(1):119- 126.
  • 4Cho H J , Hwang M C. A stimulus-response model of day-to-day network dynamics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 6(1): 17 - 25.
  • 5Cho H J , Hwang M C. Day-to-day vehicular flow dy- namics in intelligent transportation network[J]. Mathe- maticaJ and Computer Modeling, 2005, 41(4-5): 501- 522.
  • 6Smith M J , Wisten M B. A continuous day-to-day traf- fic assignment model and the existence of a continuous dynamic user equilibrium[J] search, 1995, 60(1): 59 - 79.
  • 7Annals of Operations Re- Huang H J , Lam W H K. Modeling and solving the dy- namic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues[J]. Transportation Re- search Part B, 2002, 36(3): 253 - 273.
  • 8Peeta S , Yang T H. Stability issues for dynamic traffic assignment[J]. Automatica, 2003, 39(1): 21 - 34.
  • 9Mounce R , Carey M. Route swapping in dynamic traf- fic networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2011, 45(1): 102 - 111.
  • 10Smith M J , Mounce R. A splitting rate model of traffic re-routing and traffic control[J]. Transportation Re- search Part B, 2011, 45(9): 1389 - 1409.

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部