期刊文献+

影响航空器维修安全的组织因素辨识与分析 被引量:6

Identification and analysis of organizational factors affecting aircraft maintenance safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究航空维修安全管理新思路,就组织因素影响航空维修安全问题,通过建立系统动力学(SD)模型,分析其作用机理,并辨识关键组织因素。首先依据事故因果连锁理论和"瑞士奶酪"模型,建立组织因素影响航空维修安全的概念模型;在此基础上,应用SD建模原理和方法,建立组织因素影响航空维修安全的SD模型,并在参数设置时采用模糊推理理论分析组织因素的不确定性问题;然后,利用SD模型研究各组织因素对航空维修系统安全水平的影响,对关键组织因素进行动态识别;最后,运用SD建模仿真软件Vensim PLE进行仿真计算。结果表明,用该方法能够对比分析各组织因素安全投入增长量对航空维修安全水平的影响,从而能够识别影响航空维修安全的关键组织因素。 It is held by the authors that in order to explore new ideas for aviation maintenance safety management effectively,based on issues of organizational factors affecting aviation maintenance safety,a SD model should be built to analyze the mechanism by which organizational factors affect the safety,and identify the key organizational factors. Firstly,a conceptual model of organizational factors affecting aviation maintenance safety was built based on accident causal chain theory and " Swiss cheese" model.Secondly,applying the method of SD theory,a SD model of organizational factors affecting aviation maintenance safety was built. Fuzzy inference theory was also used to analyze the uncertainty of organizational factors in the modeling process. And then,effects of organizational factors on aviation maintenance safety were studied. Key organizational factors were identified dynamically. Finally,the results of simulating calculating by using SD modeling software Vensim PLE show that this method can be used to analyze the effects of growth of safety investment in various organizational factors on aviation maintenance safety levels,and identify the key organizational factors.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期32-37,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(71171199)
关键词 航空器维修安全 组织因素 系统动力学(SD) 模糊推理 辨识 aircraft maintenance safety organizational factors system dynamics(SD) fuzzy inference identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Shang Hwa Hsu,Chun Chia Lee,Muh Cherng Wu,et al.The influence of organizational factors on safety in Taiwan highrisk industries[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2010,23(5):646-653.
  • 2Christine Chauvin,Salim Lardjane,Ga I Morel,et al.Human and organizational factors in maritime accidents:Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS[J].Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,59:26-37.
  • 3Hollnagel E.Cognitive reliability and error analysis method[M].Oxford(UK):Elsevier Science Ltd.,1998:20-40.
  • 4Michael E Mccracken.Maintenance error information management system upgrade and training evalution[D].Califormia:Naval Postgraduate,2000.
  • 5丁松滨,石荣,施和平.基于系统动力学的空中交通系统安全管理研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2006,4(4):1-6. 被引量:19
  • 6程敏,朱前程,董大旻.基于系统动力学的建筑安全监管博弈研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(12):73-81. 被引量:25
  • 7Yang Miang Goh,Peter E D Love.Methodological application of system dynamics for evaluating traffic safety policy[J].Safety Science,2012,50(7):1 594-1 605.
  • 8Hasan A A.Human factors in aircraft maintenance[D].Dominguze Hills:California State University,1998.
  • 9Reason J.Human error[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1990:2-35.
  • 10A L C Roelen,P H Lin,A R Hale.Accident models and organizational factors in air transport:The need for multi-method model[J].Safety Science,2011,49(1):5-10.

二级参考文献32

共引文献50

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部