期刊文献+

罗哌卡因局麻在脊柱后路手术中应用的性价比分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因局麻在脊柱后路手术中应用时的性价比状况。方法脊柱后路手术60例,随机分为两组,J组(局麻组)手术切皮前以0.125%罗哌卡因逐层浸润麻醉,Q组(全麻组)则直接切皮,记录术中全麻药用量、手术出血量及术后气管导管拔除时间。结果 J组全麻药用量、手术出血量及术后拔管时间都明显少于Q组(P<0.05)。结论罗哌卡因局麻在脊柱后路手术中应用简单、方便、安全,可显著减少患者的医疗费用,增加患者术后舒适度,提高患者满意度,性价比较高。
出处 《中国实用医药》 2014年第17期139-140,共2页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1罗斌如,罗杰.罗哌卡因复合丁丙诺啡在胸外术后镇痛中的应用观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2008,37(11). 被引量:2
  • 2刘莉,魏华,杨发满.西宁地区老年慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期98例临床分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2005,34(12):1530-1532. 被引量:5
  • 3秦国强.腹股沟疝传统修补和无张力修补疗效对比分析[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(08X):37-37. 被引量:14
  • 4中华医学会北京分会麻醉专业委员会.伤口连续渗透罗哌卡因进行术后镇痛.麻醉与监护论坛,2004,11(1):77-78.
  • 5黄宇光 罗爱伦.麻醉科分册[M].北京:中国协和医科大出版社,2002,8..
  • 6Mohammadi SS, Shahbazian E, Shoeibi G, et al. Effect of scalp infiltration with Bupivacaine on early hemodynamic re sponses during craniotomy under general anesthesia. Pak J Biol Sci, 2009, 12(7):603-606.
  • 7Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, et al. Pharmacology, toxicol ogy, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropi vacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed, 2008, 79 (2) :92-105.
  • 8Cuvillon P, Nouvellon E, Ripart J, et al. A comparison of the pharmacodynamies and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropi- vacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108(2): 641-649.
  • 9赵继宗,主编.临床技术操作规范·神经外科分册.北京:人民军医出版社,2007:9.
  • 10Angst MS, Koppert W, Pahl I, et al. Short term infusion of the mu opioid agonist remifentanil in humans causes hyperalge sia during withdrawal. Pain, 2003,106(1-2) :49-57.

共引文献19

同被引文献44

  • 1McGrath B, Elgendy H, Chung F, et al. Thirty percent of patients have moderate to severe pain 24 hr after ambulatory surgery: a survey of 5, 703 patients [ J ]. Can J Anaesth, 2004, 51 ( 9 ): 886-891.
  • 2Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J ]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889): 1127-1131.
  • 3Foley KT, Holly LT, Sehwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2003, 28 ( 15 Suppl ): $26-35.
  • 4Lau D, Lee JG, Han SJ, et al. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ( TLIF )[ J ]. J Clin Neurosci, 2011, 18( 5 ): 624-627.
  • 5Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2011, 24( 5 ): 288-296.
  • 6Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, et al. Clinical and radiologieal outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2009, 34 ( 13): 1385-1389.
  • 7Vizcarra-Romn MA, Bahena-Aponte JA, Cruz-Jarquin A, et al. Effectiveness of intercostal nerve block with ropivacaine in analgesia of patients undergoing emergency open cholecystectomy under general anesthesia[ J ]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 2012, 77 ( 1 ): 9-14.
  • 8Ayman M, Materazzi G, Bericotti M, et al. Bupivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.75% wound infiltration to decrease postoperative pain in total thyroidectomy, a prospective controlled study[ J ]. Minerva Chir, 2012, 67( 6 ): 511-516.
  • 9Guler G, Aksu R, Dogru K, et al. Comparison of 3 doses of ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in transurethral surgery [ J ]. Saudi Med J, 2009, 30( 1 ): 67-71.
  • 10Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine : are they clinically different? [ J ]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19( 2 ): 247-268.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部