期刊文献+

黑暗三人格的两面性及心理机制解析 被引量:10

Dark Triad of Personality:Dual Effects and Mechanisms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 马基雅维利主义、精神病态和自恋所共同具有的操控性、冷漠无情和自我中心等特质是独立于大五人格模型之外的、代表反社会性的人格特质群,被称之为"黑暗三人格(Dark Triad)"。黑暗三人格在个体层面所具有的适应价值与他们在集体层面所产生的破坏性之间的矛盾,使得它们成为近年来社会-人格和组织行为领域研究的热点。从个性的认知-情感系统和生命史理论的双重视角来解读黑暗三人格的内部动力机制,不仅有助于深入理解黑暗三人格个体对自我和他人的心理表征与情感反应模式,还能够从进化的观点认识黑暗三人格的行为动因与适应价值,为有效预测黑暗三人格个体在不同领域的行为表现提供科学指导。 The Dark Triad of personality, namely, machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy, as a new personality cluster of unique but overlapping social malevolent traits were described in a general sense as manipulation, callousness, and self-centeredness. Paradoxical findings of their social function and work behavior at communal vs. agentic level made it an im- portant issue in social personality and organizational behavior. The present paper interpretats these paradoxical outcomes from the perspective of Mischel's cognitive-affective system of personality to understand their dynamic mental representations (e. g. ,self-and-other encoding ; social interaction style)and the affective mechanisms. It also utilizes the life history strategy for understanding the social adaptations and behavioral motivation per se. These comprehensive interpretations about the un- derlying mechanisms may lead us to predict their developmental changes along effective social adaptations.
作者 张文娟 张惠
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期38-47,共10页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 黑暗三人格 消极他人偏差 情感操控 共情 生命史策略 dark triad negative biases in other perception,emotional manipulation empathy life history strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1崔芳,南云,罗跃嘉.共情的认知神经研究回顾[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(2):250-254. 被引量:65
  • 2于松梅,杨丽珠.米契尔认知情感的个性系统理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(2):197-201. 被引量:28
  • 3张文娟.(2013).青少年情绪智力的发展特点及家庭影响因素研究.北京师范大学博士学位论文.
  • 4Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., &Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Indi- vidual Differences, 47 (7), 758-762.
  • 5Austin, E. J. , Farrelly, D. , Black, C. , & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Mach[aveIlianism and emo- tional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (1), 179-189.
  • 6Austin,E. J. ,& O'Donnell, M. M. (2013). Develop- ment and preliminary validation of a scale to assess manag- ing the emotions of others. Personality and Individual Differences, 55,834-839.
  • 7Austin, E. J. , Saklofske, D. H. , Smith, M. , Tohver, G. (2014). Associations of the managing the emotions of others (MEOS) scale with personality, the Dark Triad and trait EI. Personality and Individual Differences, 65,8-13.
  • 8Babiak,P. , Neumann, C. S. ,& Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sci- ences & the Law, 28 (2), 174-193.
  • 9Back,M. D. , Schmukle, S. C. , & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 98 (1), 132.
  • 10Bagozzi, R. P. , Verbeke, W. J. , Dietvorst, R. C. , Belschak, F. D. , van den Berg, W. E. , &Rietdijk, W. J. (2013). Theory of mind and empathic explanations of ma- chiavellianism: A neuroscience perspective. Journal of Management, 39 (7), 1760-1798.

二级参考文献49

  • 1罗珊红.人格心理学的未来:等待“大一”[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(4):21-24. 被引量:9
  • 2[1]Pervin L A, John O P. Personality: Theory and research. Seventh edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1997. 401~403
  • 3[2]Mischel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 1995, 102: 246~268
  • 4[3]Rosch E H. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104: 192~233
  • 5[4]Medin D L. Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 1989, 44: 1469~1481
  • 6[6]Canton N, Mischel W, Schwartz J. Social knowledge: Structure, content, use, and abuse. In: Isen A M, Hastorf A H. eds. Cognitive Social Psychology. New York: Elsevier North Holland, Inc, 1982. 33~72
  • 7[7]Mischel W. Instruction to Personality. Sixth edition. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. 417~423
  • 8[8]Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M L. Delay of gratification in children. Science, 1989, May, 244: 933~938
  • 9[9]Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake P K. The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54: 687~696
  • 10[10]Shoda Y, Mischel W, Peake P K. Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 1990, 26(6): 978~986

共引文献91

同被引文献78

引证文献10

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部