基于国际平均全劳动法的中日购买力平价的推算被引量：1

The Calculating of Purchasing Power Parity Based on the International Average Total Labor Law

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文利用独创的国际平均全劳动法推算了2005年中日各部门购买力平价(简称PPP)。用此方法推算的PPP既可满足基国不变性原则,也可满足矩阵一致性原则。本文推算的中日各部门的PPP主要用于变换可比价格的中日投入产出表。用国际平均劳动法推算的PPP由劳动系数、投入系数和固定资本损耗系数等决定,不会受到工资率、利润率等其他市场因素的影响,因此更适用于可比价格投入产出表的转换。用国际平均劳动法推算的PPP与用GK(Geary-Khamis)法推算的PPP对GDP进行转换后发现,用国际平均全劳动法推算的中国实际GDP更大。 This paper takes advantage of international average total labor law to calculate the purchasing power parity （PPP） by industry of 2005 between Japan and China. These PPPs satisfy the base-country invariance and matrix consistency. The purpose of our PPP is to convert the input-output table of Japan and China into the same price. The international average total labor price is decided by technology, such as labor coefficient, input coefficient, fixed capital loss coefficient, it doesn＇ t be affected by wage rate and profit margin, and it apply to real price input-output table. Comparing with the GK method, China＇ s real GDP is much larger by international average total labor law.

作者戴艳娟泉弘志李洁

机构地区广东外语外贸大学大阪经济大学埼玉大学经济学科

出处《统计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期63-71,共9页 Statistical Research

关键词购买力平价投入产出表 GK法国际平均全劳动法 Purchasing Power Parity Input-Output Table GK （ Geary-Khamis ） Method International Average TotalLabor Law

分类号 F222.3 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Deaton A., A. Heston. Understanding PPPs and PPP-Based National Accounts [ J ]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, 2(4):1 -35.
2Irving B. Kravis. An Approximation of the Relative Real per Capita GDP of the People' s Republic of China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1981, 5.
3Jeffrey R. Taylor. Dollar GNP Estimates for China [ R ]. CIR Staff Paper No. 59, Washington D. C : Center for International Research U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1991.
4Maddison A. , Harry Wu. Measuring China ' s Economic Performance [ J ]. World Economics,2008, 9 ( 2 ) : 13 - 44.
5Ravallion M. Understanding PPPs and PPP-Based National Accounts: A Comment [ J ]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010,2 (4) :46 - 52.
6Ren Ruoen, Chen Kai. An Expenditure-based Bilateral Comparison of Gross Domestic Product between China and the United States [ J]. Review of Income and Wealth, 1994,40(4) :377 - 394.
7Ren Ruoen, Chen Kai. China' s GDP in U. S. Dollars Based on Purchasing Power Parity [ R ]. Policy Research Working Paper 1415. The World Bank, Washington D. C: The world Bank International Economics Department Socio-Economic Data Division, 1995.
8Ren Ruoen. China' s Economic Performance in an International Perspective[M]. Paris: OECD Publication, 1997.
9Sraffa P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodity [ M]. Cambridge University Press. 1960.
10World Bank. Global Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures [ M]. 2005 International Comparison Program, www. Worldbank. Org/data/icp ), World Bank, Washington DC. 2008.

二级参考文献16

1Abd-el-Rahman, K. 1991. Firms' Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127 ( 1 ): 83-97.
2Andresen, M.A. 2008. The evolving quality of trade between Canada and the United States. Canadian Geographer 52 (1): 22-37.
3Balassa, Bela. 1966. Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufactures among the Industrial Countries.The American Economic Review, Vol. 56, pp. 466-473.
4Falvey, R., Henryk Kierzkowski. 1987. Product Quality, Intra-Industry Trade and (Im)Perfect Competition.ln: Henryk Kierzkowski (Ed.), Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor of W.M. Corden. Oxford 1987.
5Falvey, R. E. 1981. Commercial Policy and Intra-Industry Trade, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 495-511.
6Finger, J. M. 1975. Trade Overlap and Intra-Industry Trade, Economics Inquiry, Vol. 13, pp. 581-589.
7Flam, Harry., Elhanan Helpman. 1987. Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade. The American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 810-822.
8Fontang6, L. and M. Freudenberg (1997): liT: Methodological Issues Reconsidered. CEPII.
9Working Paper 97/02, Centre d'6tudes Prospective et d'Information Internationale,Paris.
10Fontang6, L., M. Freudenberg and G. Gaulier. 2006. A Systematic Decomposition of World Trade into Horizontal and Vertical liT. Review of World Economics, 142(3), 459-475.