期刊文献+

Numerical Analysis of Static Performance Comparison of Friction Stir Welded versus Riveted 2024-T3 Aluminum Alloy Stiffened Panels

Numerical Analysis of Static Performance Comparison of Friction Stir Welded versus Riveted 2024-T3 Aluminum Alloy Stiffened Panels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Most researches on the static performance of stiffened panel joined by friction stir welding(FSW) mainly focus on the compression stability rather than shear stability. To evaluate the potential of FSW as a replacement for traditional rivet fastening for stiffened panel assembly in aviation application, finite element method(FEM) is applied to compare compression and shear stability performances of FSW stiffened panels with stability performances of riveted stiffened panels. FEMs of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy FSW and riveted stiffened panels are developed and nonlinear static analysis method is applied to obtain buckling pattern, buckling load and load carrying capability of each panel model. The accuracy of each FEM of FSW stiffened panel is evaluated by stability experiment of FSW stiffened panel specimens with identical geometry and boundary condition and the accuracy of each FEM of riveted stiffened panel is evaluated by semi-empirical calculation formulas. It is found that FEMs without considering weld-induced initial imperfections notably overestimate the static strengths of FSW stiffened panels. FEM results show that, buckling patterns of both FSW and riveted compression stiffened panels represent local buckling of plate between stiffeners. The initial buckling waves of FSW stiffened panel emerge uniformly in each plate between stiffeners while those of riveted panel mainly emerge in the mid-plate. Buckling patterns of both FSW and riveted shear stiffened panels represent local buckling of plate close to the loading corner. FEM results indicate that, shear buckling of FSW stiffened panel is less sensitive to the initial imperfections than compression buckling. Load carrying capability of FSW stiffened panel is less sensitive to the initial imperfections than initial buckling. It can be concluded that buckling loads of FSW panels are a bit lower than those of riveted panels whereas carrying capabilities of FSW panels are almost equivalent to those of riveted panels with identical geometries. Finite element method for simulating static performances of FSW and riveted stiffened panels is proposed and evaluated and some beneficial conclusions are obtained, which offer useful references for analysis and application of FSW to replace rivet fastening in aviation stiffened panel assembly. Most researches on the static performance of stiffened panel joined by friction stir welding(FSW) mainly focus on the compression stability rather than shear stability. To evaluate the potential of FSW as a replacement for traditional rivet fastening for stiffened panel assembly in aviation application, finite element method(FEM) is applied to compare compression and shear stability performances of FSW stiffened panels with stability performances of riveted stiffened panels. FEMs of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy FSW and riveted stiffened panels are developed and nonlinear static analysis method is applied to obtain buckling pattern, buckling load and load carrying capability of each panel model. The accuracy of each FEM of FSW stiffened panel is evaluated by stability experiment of FSW stiffened panel specimens with identical geometry and boundary condition and the accuracy of each FEM of riveted stiffened panel is evaluated by semi-empirical calculation formulas. It is found that FEMs without considering weld-induced initial imperfections notably overestimate the static strengths of FSW stiffened panels. FEM results show that, buckling patterns of both FSW and riveted compression stiffened panels represent local buckling of plate between stiffeners. The initial buckling waves of FSW stiffened panel emerge uniformly in each plate between stiffeners while those of riveted panel mainly emerge in the mid-plate. Buckling patterns of both FSW and riveted shear stiffened panels represent local buckling of plate close to the loading corner. FEM results indicate that, shear buckling of FSW stiffened panel is less sensitive to the initial imperfections than compression buckling. Load carrying capability of FSW stiffened panel is less sensitive to the initial imperfections than initial buckling. It can be concluded that buckling loads of FSW panels are a bit lower than those of riveted panels whereas carrying capabilities of FSW panels are almost equivalent to those of riveted panels with identical geometries. Finite element method for simulating static performances of FSW and riveted stiffened panels is proposed and evaluated and some beneficial conclusions are obtained, which offer useful references for analysis and application of FSW to replace rivet fastening in aviation stiffened panel assembly.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第4期761-767,共7页 中国机械工程学报(英文版)
关键词 friction stir welding rivet fastening stiffened panel stability performance finite element method(FEM) friction stir welding rivet fastening stiffened panel stability performance finite element method(FEM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1栾国红,季亚娟,简波.飞机轻金属结构的搅拌摩擦焊[J].航空制造技术,2006,49(12):50-53. 被引量:5
  • 2YOON J W, BRAY G H, VALENTE R A F, et al. Buckling analysis for an integrally stiffened panel structure with a friction stir weld[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2009, 47: 1608-1622.
  • 3JEOM K E Buckling collapse testing on friction stir welded aluminum stiffened plate structures[R]. Research Report SSC-456, Ship Structure Committee, USA, 2009.
  • 4MURPHY A, MCCUNE W, QUINN D, et al. The characterization of friction stir welding process effects on stiffened panel buckling performance[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2007, 45: 339-351.
  • 5MURPHY A, LYNCH F, PRICE M, et al. Modified stiffened panel analysis methods for laser beam and friction stir welded aircraft panels[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2006, 220: 267-278.
  • 6KRAMER R. In-service performance of aluminum structural details[R]. Research Report SSC-447, Ship Structure Committee, USA, 2007.
  • 7周承惆.薄壳弹塑性稳定性理论[M]北京:国防工业出版社,197912-52.
  • 8沈惠申.板壳后屈曲行为[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002.
  • 9<飞机设计手册>总编委会.飞机设计手册[M]北京:航空工业出版社,2001.
  • 10Gerard G,Becker H. Handbook of structural stability:part Ⅲ-buckling of curved plates and shells.NACA TN-3783[R].1957.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部