期刊文献+

基于微水试验的北京大兴隐伏岩溶裂隙渗透系数求取方法 被引量:6

Determination of Permeability Coefficient of Concealed Karst Fractures Using Slug Test in Daxing of Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 微水试验是进行岩土体渗透性测试的重要技术手段与方法。选取北京大兴隐伏奥陶系灰岩岩溶裂隙含水层作为目标层,依据现场条件选择生产井,利用水位自动监测装置记录停泵水位恢复法,HSZK振荡试验法与注水试验法进行微水试验应用研究,发现获得的目标层渗透系数小于传统抽水试验结果。分析认为造成这种差异的原因在于不同试验方法的影响半径不同,而微水试验结果更能体现试验点岩土体的渗透性。此外,在裂隙与岩溶介质中运用微水试验要尽量减小、避免皮肤效应的影响,选择试验方法时要保证水位瞬时变化的实现,对于主裂隙,可以借助栓塞进行分段试验。 Slug test is an important method to determine the permeability of rock and soil masses.In this paper,the permeability of the concealed Ordovician karst-fractured limestone aquifer in Daxing of Beijing was estimated.The production wells were selected according to the in-situ conditions,and the slug test design included the pump-off water level recovery method recorded by auto-monitoring system,HSZK oscillation method,and injection method.The results showed that the permeability obtained from the slug test is less than that determined by the conventional pumping test.The discrepancy was mainly due to the difference of influence radius in different test methods,and slug test can reflect the permeability at the local scale more accurately.Additionally,it is necessary to reduce or avoid the well skin effect while performing the slug test in the fracture and karst medium.The realization of instantaneous water level change needs to be conducted when designing the slug test and the plug-sealing sectional test can be used in the main fractures.
出处 《南水北调与水利科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期156-160,共5页 South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
基金 北京岩溶水资源勘查评价工程(专题类第一项:数值模拟)(BJYRS-ZT-01-01)
关键词 微水试验 裂隙与岩溶介质 渗透系数 影响半径 皮肤效应 slug test fracture and karst medium permeability coefficient influence radius well skin effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wang J S Y,Narasimhan T N,Tsang C F,et al.A Transient Flow in Tight Fractures,in Proc.Invitational Well-Testing Symp[J].Lawrence Berkeley Lab,1977:103.
  • 2Karasaki K,Long J C S,Witherspoon P A.Analytical Models of Slug Tests[J].Water Resour.Res.,1988,24(1):115.
  • 3Moench A F.Double-porosity Models for a Fissured Groundwater Reservoir with Fracture Skin[J].Water Resour.Res.,1984,20(7):831.
  • 4Butler Jr J J.The Design,Performance,and Analysis of Slug Tests[J].Lewis Publishers,1997:252.
  • 5Lee J Y,K K Lee.Analysis of the Quality of Parameter Estimates from Repeated Pumping and Slug Tests in a Fractured Porous Aquifer System in Wonju,Korea[J].Ground Water,1999,37(5):699-700.
  • 6Olivier Audouin,Jacques Bodin.Cross-borehole Slug Test Analysis in a Fractured Limestone Aquifer[J].Journal of Hydrology,2008(10):510-523.
  • 7Cheng J T,Everett M E.Finite Element Modeling of Slug Tests in an Aquifer with Stratigraphical and Structural Heterogeneities[J].Geofluids,2009(9):49-62.
  • 8Quinn P,Cherry JA,Parker BL.Hydraulic Testing Using a Versatile Straddle Packer System for Improved Transmissivity Estimation in Fractured-rock Boreholes[J].Hydrogelogy Journal,2012(20):1529-1547.
  • 9Chen CS,Sie YC,Lin YT.A Review of the Multilevel Slug Test for Characterizing Aquifer Heterogeneity[J].Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,2012(23):131-143.
  • 10Kipp Jr,Kenneth L.Type Curve Analysis of Inertial Effects in the Response of a Well to a Slug Test[J].Water Resources Research,1985,21(9):1397-1408.

二级参考文献21

  • 1郭建青,李彦,王洪胜,马健.含水层抽水试验水位恢复过程数据的直线图解分析法[J].水利学报,2004,35(10):22-26. 被引量:16
  • 2沈珍瑶,谢彤芳.确定含水层渗透系数的微水试验法[J].地下水,1994,16(1):4-6. 被引量:26
  • 3Kenneth L Kipp Jr. Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test. Water Resources Research, 1985,21(9) : 1397 - 1408.
  • 4Cooper H H,Jr J D Bredehoeft, and I S Papadopulos. Respense of a finite diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Wa- ter Resources Research, 1967,3:263 - 269.
  • 5Herman Bouwer and R C Rice. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely orpartially penetrating wells. Water Resources Research, 1976, 12 (3) :423 - 428.
  • 6Olivier Audouin, Jacques Bodin. Analysis of slug tests with high- frequency oscillations. Hydrology, 2007,334: 282 - 289.
  • 7ZEMANSKY G M, MCELWEE C D. High-resolution slug testing[J]. Ground Water, 2005, 43(2): 222 - 230.
  • 8MCELWEE C D. Improving the analysis of slug tests[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 269(3/4): 122-133.
  • 9KIPP K L J. Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test[J]. Water Resources Research, 1985, 21(9): 1397 - 1408.
  • 10ZLOTNIK V A, MCGUIRE V L. Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 1. modification of the Springer-Gelhar(SG) model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 204(1-4): 271- 282.

共引文献35

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部