期刊文献+

WEGO种植系统的临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of WEGO implant system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:随着种植义齿愈来愈多的应用于口腔修复领域,全球约近千种品牌不同表面处理及平台设计的种植体问世,然而国内已应用于临床的种植系统极少。目的:通过临床试验,观察和评价WEGO种植系统临床应用的安全性和有效性。方法:募集志愿者并经过严格的病例筛选,排除全身及局部禁忌症(血常规、血凝长规、肝肾糖查体等),根据个体条件不同,分别采用埋入式、非埋入式方案,选择60例牙列缺损患者植入喷砂和酸蚀(SLA)表面处理的WEGO种植体60枚,2-4个月行种植修复,三个月血液指标检查,通过临床检查及影像学分析对临床效果进行评价。结果和结论:60例患者植入前后血液指标差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),此种植系统临床安全性可靠。依照Albrektsson等的口腔种植评价标准60枚种植体骨结合良好,留存率100%,成功率100%,宿主无不良反应。种植术后即刻、修复后即刻、植入后1年种植体近中边缘骨高度分别为(0.33±0.45)、(0.14±0.43)、(0.16±0.37)mm;远中边缘骨高度分别为(0.17±0.43)、(0.04±0.49)、(0.11±0.40)mm,种植体植人后第1年颈部骨吸收量近中为(0.16±0.37)mm,远中为(0.04±0.35)mm。结果表明喷砂和酸蚀(SLA)表面处理的WEGO种植系统临床应用安全,修复效果有效。 Background: With denture planting more and more applications in dental restorations, brand around the world nearly one thousand kinds of different surface treatment and platform design of implants, but the domestic is very little cropping system has been applied in clinical. Objective:Through clinical experiment, to observe and evaluate WEGO planting system the safety and efficacy of clinical application. Methods: Volunteers who passed strict screening were selected as study subjects. Systemic and local contraindications were excluded (blood routine, blood clotting and hepatorenal index, etc). A total of 60 patients who had 60 WEGO implants implanted were followed up for one year. Permanent restorations were finished 2 to 4 months after the implantation. And blood index would be tested again after three months. Clinical effects were evaluated through clinical and imaging examination. Results and Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference of postoperation blood indexes. So WEGO planting system is safety and reliable in clinical. Clinical effects were evaluated with the Albrektsson&#39;s criteria. Favorable osseointegration was formed rapidly. Both the survival rate and successful rate of implants were 100%. High degree of satisfaction from patients was achieved. Planting immediately after surgery, immediately after the restoration, 1 year after surgery marginal bone height in nearly is respectively (0.33 ±0.45), (0.14 ±0.43), (0.16 ±0.37)mm. Marginal bone height in far is respectively(0.17±0.43)、(0.04±0.49)、(0.11±0.40)mm. The marginal bone loss 1 year after surgery was (0.16 ±0.37)mm in nearly and (0.04 ±0.35)mm in far. WEGO planting system could be considered as a manageable and satisfactory implant system. This system can obviously reduce bone resorption.
出处 《中国口腔种植学杂志》 2014年第2期80-84,共5页 Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
关键词 牙种植 WEGO种植系统 表面处理 平台转移 dental implant, WEGO planting system, surface modification, platform switching
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Albreksson T, Zarb GA, Worthington DP, et al. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986, 1:11-25.
  • 2Sergio Allegrini Jr, Elisabeth Rumpel, Ellen Kauschke, et al.Hydrox yapatite grafting promotes new bone formation and osseointegration of smooth titanium implants [ J] . Annals of Anatomy.2006, 188:143-151.
  • 3Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, et al. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstruc- tured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration.A scanning electron microscopic study [J] .Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16 (6): 657-666.
  • 4Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 12 year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin oral Implants Res,2004, 15 (1) : 8-17.
  • 5Albrektsson T, Wennerborg Oral implant surfaces: review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfices.Int J Prosthodont, 2004,17 (5): 544-564.
  • 6RONOLD H J, ELLINGSEN J E. Effect of micro- roughness produced by TiO2 blasting-tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials, 2002, 23 (21) : 4211-4219.
  • 7Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2004,15 (1) :142-149.
  • 8Balleri P,Cozzolino A,Ghelli L,el al. Stability mea- surements of osseo-integrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: A pilot study [J].Clin Impl Dent Relat Res, 2002,4 (3): 128-132.
  • 9肖菲,刘沂,王烁琳,徐昊,郭力强,赵保东.种植体表面处理与骨结合效应:3i种植系统的临床应用[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(21):3877-3881. 被引量:2
  • 10Nikellis I, Levi A, Nicolopo ulos C. Immediate load- ing of 190 endosseous dental implants: a prospective observational study of 40 patient treatments with up to 2-year data [J] . Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19 (1) : 116-123.

二级参考文献49

  • 1吴大怡,腾立钊,张沃淮.前颌原位离体牙冠在即刻种植修复时的应用[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2009,14(2):29-30. 被引量:4
  • 2林野.当代口腔种植学的进展及其临床意义[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(4):285-290. 被引量:69
  • 3黄炎,鲜苏琴.种植体设计对即刻种植与即刻负荷成功的影响[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(2):131-133. 被引量:2
  • 4郑军,赵保东,李宁毅,王艳辉.前牙美学区即刻种植的临床疗效观察[J].山东医药,2007,47(7):21-22. 被引量:5
  • 5Albreksson T,Zarb GA,Worthington DP,et al.The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants:a review and proposed criteria of success.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.1986;1:11-25.
  • 6Schicho K,Kastner J,Klingesberger R,et al.Surface area analysis of dental implants using micro-computed tomography.Clin Oral Impl Res.2007; 18:459-464.
  • 7Karoussis IK,Bragger U,Salvi GE.Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants:a 12 year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System.Clin Oral Impl Res.2004; 15 (1):8-17.
  • 8Kang BS,Sul YT,Oh SJ,et al.XPS,AES,and SEM analysis of recent dental implants.Acta Biomaterialia.2009; 5:2222-2229.
  • 9Park JY,Davies JE.Red Blood Cell and Platelet Interactions With Titanium Implant Surfaces.Clin Oral Impl Res.2000; 11:530-539.
  • 10Zinger.Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography.Biomaterials.2003; 25:2695-2711.

共引文献29

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部