期刊文献+

Minimization of Classification Samples for Supercritical and Subcritical Patterns of Supersonic Inlet

Minimization of Classification Samples for Supercritical and Subcritical Patterns of Supersonic Inlet
原文传递
导出
摘要 In order to investigate sample minimization for classification of supercritical and subcritical patterns in supersonic inlet, three optimization methods, namely, opposite one towards nearest method, closest one towards the byper-plane method and random selection method, are proposed for investigation on minimization of classification samples for supercritical and subcritical patterns of supersonic inlet. The study has been carried out to analyze wind tunnel test data and to compare the classification accuracy based on those three methods with or without priori knowledge. Those three methods are different from each other by different selecting methods for samples. The results show that one of the optimization methods needs the minimization samples to get the highest classification accuracy without priori knowledge. Meanwhile, the number of minimization samples needed to get highest classification accuracy can be further reduced by introducing priori knowledge. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the best optimization method has been found by comparing all cases studied with or without introducing priori knowledge. This method can be applied to reduce the number of wind tunnel tests to obtain the inlet performance and to identify the supercritical/subcritical modes for supersonic inlet.
出处 《Journal of Thermal Science》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第4期375-380,共6页 热科学学报(英文版)
基金 Academy of Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Sciences,Harbin Institute of Technology
关键词 Supersonic inlet Inlet supercritical/subcritical Sample minimization 分类精度 临界模式 小样本 超临界 最小化 超声速进气道 超音速进气道 先验知识
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Mashio S., Kurashina K., Bamba T., Okimoto S. and Kaji S., "Unstart Phenomenon Due to Thermal Choke Scramjet Module," 10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS In- ternational Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference , Kyoto, Japan, 24-27, April, 2011.
  • 2Rodi P. E., Emami S., Trexler C.A., "Unsteady Pressure Behavior in a Ramjet/Seramjet Inlet," Journal of Propul- sion and Power, Vol. 12, No.3, 1996, pp. 486-493.
  • 3Hawkins W. R., Marquart E. J., "Two-Dimensional Ge- neric Inlet Unstart Detection at Mach 2.5-5.0," 6th Inter-national Aerospace Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Chattanooga, Tennessee, 3-7, April, 1995.
  • 4Voland R., Auslender A., Smart M., Roudakov A., Se- menov V. and Kopchenov V., "ClAM/NASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight and Ground Test," 9th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Con- ference, Norfolk, VA, U.S.A, 01, November,1999.
  • 5Mutzman R., Murphy S., "X-51 Development: A Chief Engineer's Perspective," 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Con- ference, San Francisco, California, 11 April, 2011.
  • 6Wagner J. L., Yuceil K. B., Valdivia A., Clemens N.T. and Dolling D.S., "Experimental Investigation of Unstart in an Inlet/Isolator Model in Mach 5 Flow," AIAA Journal, Vol.47, No.6, 2009, pp. 1528-1542.
  • 7Cui T., Yu D. R., Chang J. T. and Bao W., "Topological Geometry Interpretation of Supersonic Inlet Start/Unstart Based on Catastrophe Theory," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.45, No. 4, 2008, pp.1464-1468.
  • 8Cui T., Yu D. R., Chang J. T. and Bao W., "Catastrophe Model for Supersonic Inlet Start/Unstart," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.46, No.4, 2009, pp. 1160-1166.
  • 9Mayer D.W., Paynter G. C., "Prediction of Supersonic Inlet Unstart Caused by Freestream Disturbances." 32th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 10-13, January, 1994.
  • 10Hutzel J.R., Decker D.D., Cobb R.G., King P.I., Veth M. J. and Donbar J.M., "Scramjet Isolator Shock Train Loca- tion Techniques," 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Expo- sition, Orlando, Florida, 4-7, January, 2011.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部