期刊文献+

不同环保意识视角下的DEA效率模型 被引量:2

The DEA Models Under Different Environmental Awareness Perspectives
下载PDF
导出
摘要 DEA在效率分析领域具有良好的应用,随着全球气候的不断恶劣和环境的逐渐破坏,公众环保意识不断增强,在进行相关效率研究时,非期望产出越来越受到重视。以非期望产出为主要研究点,根据社会对非期望产出指标的认识规律将环保意识分为五个不同阶段,并综合考虑每个意识阶段的特征,将环境指标变动能力,环境承载能力、环境负外部性参与度、外部环境政策管理及企业生产要求纳入DEA效率分析过程中,通过对目标函数和约束条件进行不同的改进和约束,构建了不同意识阶段的DEA效率分析模型,并探讨了各阶段模型的使用范围和相互关系。最后,选取一个实例进行试算,证明各DEA模型的可行性和有效性。 The DEA model has been applied popularly to the field of the efficiency analysis. With the deterioration of the global climate and the destruction of the environment,public environmental awareness continues rising. As a result,the undesirable outputs tend to receiving more and more attention. For detailed analysis of the efficiency analysis in each case,the environmental awareness is divided into five different stages based on the law of cognition of the undesirable outputs. Given the main manifestations of each stage division,environment indicator changing capacity,environmental carrying capacity,environmental negative externalities,environmental policy management and enterprise production requirements are combined with efficiency analysis process respectively by adding constrains into traditional DEA models and improving the objective function of DEA models under different environmental awareness perspectives. Afterwards,the application range and the relationships between models are discussed. Finally,an example is chosen to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of DEA models.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期202-208,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目:基于中国石油安全视角的海外油气资源接替战略研究(ZD164) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:中国与全球油气资源重点区域合作研究(09JZD0038) 北京市优博论文资助项目:能源系统DEA方法体系(20121141402)
关键词 管理科学 效率模型 DEA 不同环保意识阶段 非期望产出 management science efficiency models DEA various environmental awareness stages undesirable outputs
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1戴铁军,陆钟武.钢铁企业生态效率分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1168-1173. 被引量:72
  • 2戴铁军,陆钟武.钢铁生产流程铁资源效率的分析[J].钢铁,2006,41(6):77-82. 被引量:13
  • 3历以宁 章铮.环境经济学[M].北京:中国计划出版社,1995..
  • 4魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987.1-130.
  • 5魏权龄.评价相对有效性的EDA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987..
  • 6Fare R. Grosskopf S. Lovell C A K,Pasurka C. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach[J]. Review of Economic and Statistics,1989,71(1) : 91-98.
  • 7Fare R , Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K, Yaisawarng S. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approch[.l ]. Review of Economic and statistics, 1993,75 ( 2 ) : 374 - 380.
  • 8Zofio J L. Prieto A M. Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries[J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2001,23 (1) :63 - 83.
  • 9盛照瀚 朱乔 等.DEA理论、方法与应用[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1996..
  • 10孙振清,赵秀生,刘滨,何建坤.钢铁生产环境影响的ECECA方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(9):1541-1544. 被引量:4

共引文献170

同被引文献46

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部