期刊文献+

公交服务治理模式的效益比较研究 被引量:3

Profit Comparison of Public Bus Transport Service Governance Modes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公交服务的市场化改革需要选择合理的治理模式以应对产生的种种问题,各模式间的效益比较就成为选择的关键因素。在理论比较PPP模式和网络治理模式的基础上,本文以PPP模式为参照对象,假定公交服务参与主体平等的合作,从各主体的控制权分配、努力水平和产出效率构建公交服务总效益模型,并进行了模型的理论分析和数据模拟,结果表明:总效益与各方主体的努力水平、控制权和产出效率紧密相关,仅当政府和社会群体间的边际成本替代率在合理范围内时,网络治理模式的总效益大于PPP模式,当超出合理范围时会使前者小于后者。 The marketing reform of public bus transport service needs to choose reasonable governance mode,and the key factor is the comparison profits of all kinds of governance modes. Based on the comparison of the modes between PPP and network governance,this paper takes the PPP mode as a research objective and supposes all subjects to be fair on cooperation. It constructs the profit models of public bus transport service from the subjects' allocation of control rights,effort level and output efficiency,and then it makes a theoretical analysis and a digital simulation. The results show that the profits closely relate to the allocation of control rights,effort level and output efficiency. And only when the rate substitution of marginal cost between governments and social groups is in a certain range,the profit of network governance mode will be bigger than PPP mode. Otherwise the profit of PPP mode will be bigger.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期244-251,共8页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303028) 辽宁经济社会发展课题(2014lslktxxjx-01) 大连理工大学科研启动经费(DUT12RC[3]87)
关键词 城市发展与管理 效益比较 合作博弈 网络治理模式 PPP模式 urban development and management comparison of profit cooperative game network governance mode PPP mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice[ J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theo- ry, 2007, 18(4): 543-571.
  • 2Edelenobs J, Klijn E H. Project versus process management in public-private partnership: relation between management style and outcomes [ J ]. International Public Management Journal, 2009, 12 ( 3 ) : 310-331.
  • 3Klijn E H, Steijn B, Edelenobs J. The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks[ J]. Public Ad- ministration, 2010, (3) : 1-20.
  • 4Warner M E. Reversing privatization, rebalancing government reform: markets, deliberation and planning[ J].'P01icy and Society, 2008, 27(9): 163-174.
  • 5Stoker G. Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance [ J ]. American Review of Public Administra- tion, 2006, 36(1): 41-57.
  • 6Hart O, Shleifer A, Vishny R W. The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons[ J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(4): 1127-1161.
  • 7Besley T, Ghatak M. Government versus private ownership of public goods[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116 (4) : 1343-1372.
  • 8Francesconi M, Muthoo A. Control rights in public-private partnershiosF R1. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2143. 2006. (5):1-35.
  • 9张喆,贾明,万迪昉.PPP背景下控制权配置及其对合作效率影响的模型研究[J].管理工程学报,2009,23(3):23-29. 被引量:63
  • 10赵立力,卜祥智,黄庆.BOT项目运营外包时的各参与方决策分析[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(2):5-11. 被引量:3

二级参考文献87

共引文献146

同被引文献62

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部