期刊文献+

基于公平偏好的三阶段锦标激励模型研究 被引量:7

Study on Three-period Tournament Incentives Model Based on Fairness Preferences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决多代理人激励及委托人道德风险问题,本文基于公平偏好理论,构建了三阶段锦标激励模型,通过数理推导研究委托人最大化目标下公平偏好与工资差距对代理人努力水平和拆台行为的影响,并对不同晋升过程下代理人各阶段的努力水平进行比较。结果表明,代理人的努力水平与拆台行为同升同降,公平偏好降低代理人的努力水平和拆台行为,而工资差距提高代理人的努力水平和拆台行为,且无论晋升过程如何,代理人在第一阶段的努力水平均大于其第三阶段的努力水平。本文拓展了行为经济学视角下基于委托代理框架的锦标赛激励研究。 In order to solve the multi-agent incentives and the principal's moral hazard problems,based on fairness preferences,the paper builds three-period tournament incentives model and discusses the effect of fairness preferences and wage spreads on the agent's effort level and sabotage through the mathematical induction method. Then the paper compares agent's effort level of each stage under different promotion process. The results show that agent's effort level and sabotage change in the same way,and fairness preferences of agent reduce the agent's effort level and sabotage while wage spreads improve the agent's effort level and sabotage. And agent's effort level in the first period is always higher than it in the third period regardless of the promotion process. The paper expands the study of tournament incentives from the perspective of behavioral economics based on principal-agent model.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期257-263,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371111) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20133718110009) 山东科技大学杰出青年和创新团队项目(2011KYJQ103 2011KYTD104)
关键词 企业管理 三阶段锦标激励 FS模型 公平偏好 拆台行为 委托代理模型 corporate management three-period tournament incentives FS model fairness preferences sabotage principal-agent model
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Lazear E P, Rosen S. Rank-order tournament as optimum labor contracts [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89 (5) : 841-864.
  • 2Kahneman D, Knetsch J L, Thaler R H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics[ J]. The Journal of Business, 1986, 59 (4) : 285-300.
  • 3Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economies [ J]. The American Economie Review, 1993, 85 (5) : 1281-1302.
  • 4Fehr E, Sehmidt K M. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114 (3) : 817-868.
  • 5Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L. Fairness and effort-evidence from a field experiment[ R]. Mannheim: Zew. de, 2008.
  • 6Grund C, Sliwka D. Envy and compassion in tournaments[ J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2005, 14 (1) : 187-207.
  • 7Sheremeta R, Wu S. Testing canonical tournament theory: on the impact of risk, social preferences and utility structure[ R]. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 6304, 2012.
  • 8Sjtigren Lindquist G. Tournaments and unfair treatment [ J]. The Journal of Soeio-Economics, 2010, (6) : 670-681.
  • 9郭心毅,蒲勇健,陈斌.不公平对待对努力水平的影响——基于三阶段锦标模型的研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(5):135-140. 被引量:6
  • 10Satio K. Social preferences under uncertainty: equality of opportunity vs. equality of outcome[ R]. Social Science Working Paper, 2012. 1362.

二级参考文献33

  • 1BLAU P.Exchange and power in social life [M] .New York: Wiley, 1964.
  • 2ROUSSEAU D.M.Psychological and implied contracts in organization [ J] .Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1989(2): 121-139.
  • 3ROUSSEAU D.M.New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: a study of psychological contracts [ J ] .Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1990(5): 389-400.
  • 4ROBINSON S.L., M.S.KRAATZ, D.M.ROUSSEAU.Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study [ J ] .The Academy of Management Journal, 1994,37 : 137-152.
  • 5ROBINSON SL,D.M.ROUSSEAU.Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm [ J ] .Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994,15 : 245-259.
  • 6AKERLOF GEORGE A,JANET L.YELLEN.The fair wage- effort hypothesis and unemployment [ J ] .Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990,105(2): 255-83.
  • 7FEHR ERNST,KLAUS M.SCHMIDT.A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation [J] .Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999,114(3): 817-868.
  • 8BOLTON GARY E.,AXEL OCKENFELS.ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and cooperation [ J] .American Economic Review, 2000,90(1) : 166-93.
  • 9CHARNESS GARY,MATTHEW RABIN.Understanding social preferences with simple tests [ J ] .Quarterly Journal of Economics,2002,117(3): 817-69.
  • 10STARK.O.A.Relative deprivation approach of performance incentives in career games and other contests[ J ] .Kykols, 1990, 43(2):211-227.

共引文献23

同被引文献72

  • 1李富国,杨智斌.商业银行:高层经营管理者激励约束机制的动态模型[J].当代经济科学,2004,26(4):31-35. 被引量:7
  • 2魏光兴,蒲勇健.公平偏好与锦标激励[J].管理科学,2006,19(2):42-47. 被引量:19
  • 3Alvarez S A, Barney J B. Resource-based theory and the entrepreneurial firm [ M ]. Strategic Entrepreneurship : Cre- ating a New Mindset,2002.
  • 4Cao G,Wiengarten F, Humphreys P. Towards a contingen- cy resource-based view of IT business value[ J]. Systemic Practice & Action Researeh,2011,24( 1 ) :85 -106.
  • 5Vinekar V, Teng J T C. The resource-based view of IT business value:complementary investments or embedded knowledge? [ J ]. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management ,2012,11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 13.
  • 6Dodgson H U M. Contributing factors to the diffusion of IT within small and medium-sized firms in indonesia [ J]. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 2014,4(2) :22-37.
  • 7Neirotti P, Paolucci E. Industry and firm effects on IT dif- fusion processes:firm-level evidence in Italian enterprises [ J]. Industrial & Corporate Change ,2014,23 (3) :717 - 757.
  • 8Reis R A D, Freitas M D C D. Critical factors on informa- tion technology acceptance and use:an analysis on small and medium Brazilian clothing industries [ J ]. Procedia Comouter Science ,2014,31 ( 1 ) : 105 - 114.
  • 9Santhanam R, Hartono E. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance [ J ]. MIS quar- terly,2003,27 ( 1 ) : 125 - 153.
  • 10Samhamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options : Reconceptualizing the role of in- formation technology in contemporary firms [ J ]. MIS quar- terly,2003,27 (2) : 237 - 263.

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部