元儒程端学论《春秋》“属辞比事”

Yuan Confucist Cheng Duanxue's Doctrine of “Analoging Historic Records to Disguise Reason”in Spring and Fall

元儒程端学认为《春秋》之"义"是通过"属辞比事"来体现的,这显示了他治经客观求实的一面。但他认为理解了经文的"属辞比事",甚至连传文都可以不要,就可以很好地理解经文,则又显示了他治经主观刚愎的一面,程端学认为"属辞比事"有大小之分,说明他治学兼具宏观与微观眼光。而他关于经文之"属辞比事"可信,而传文之"属辞比事"不可信的论说,则再一次显示了他的尊经驳传倾向。

Yuan Confucist Cheng Duanxue insisted on the philosophy of Spring and Fall reflected by＂Analoging historic records to disguise reason＂,revealing his impersonality and practicality in researching the classics,but his subjectivity and perversity is also appeared in comprehending Confucian cannon only through its composition style and disguising skill not even using related interpretations. With microcosmic and macrocosmic perspective he demanded＂Analoging historic records to disguise reason＂divided by its narration interval,but his worshiping Confucian scripture is showed in believing the composition style and disguising skill of the scriptures rather than those of its interpretations.