期刊文献+

当前西方大国对非洲干预的新变化:理论争鸣与实证分析 被引量:4

On the New Trends of Current Intervention in Africa by Western Powers:Theoretical Controversy and Practical Interpretation
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前,西方大国对非洲的干预在理论上摒弃了"新干涉主义",而采用"保护的责任"。"保护的责任"关键概念的模糊性和不确定性,使其在理论上存有争议。正是这种模糊性和不确定性使西方能够以"保护的责任"之名,实施干预非洲事务,实现自身利益之实。西方大国对非军事干预的新特点表现在:争取联合国授权,获得干预的合法性;打着"道义"之名,推行"霸道"之实;采取多边合作方式,减少干预成本;利用大众传媒,引导民心民意。其结果却是造成了非洲安全局势的复杂化和非洲自主安全合作的弱化。 Currently, the western powers have abandoned the " New Interventionism" and begin to interfere in Africa according to the " Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) . The ambiguity and uncertainty of R2P' s key concepts cause some theoretical controversy. It is the ambiguity and uncertainty that provides the excuse for the Western Powers to intervene in African affairs in the name of R2P and pursue their real interests in effect. The intervention has four characteristics: trying to acquire UN mandate for the legitimacy of the intervention; trying to justify the intervention to win moral support; adopting multilateral ways of cooperation to reduce intervention cost, and utilizing the mass media to direct the public opinion. As a result, the security situation in Africa has been complicated, and the security cooperation between African countries weakened.
作者 刘青建 王勇
出处 《西亚非洲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期43-63,共21页 West Asia and Africa
关键词 军事干预 非洲 “新干涉主义” “保护的责任” Military Intervention Africa " New Interventionism " "' Responsibility to Protect"
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1[英国]尼古拉斯·惠勒著;张德生译.《拯救陌生人-国际社会中的人道主义干涉》,中央编译出版社,2011年版,第184页.
  • 2落墨.《科索沃战争:完全是一场人道主义灾难》,http://bbs.xinjunshi.com/zhuanti/20131228/132317.html.2014-04-25.
  • 3Stanlake Samkange, " African Perspectives on Intervention and State Sovereignty", African Security Review, Vol. 11,2002, p. 2.
  • 4卢静.“保护的责任”:国际关系新规范?[J].当代世界,2013(2):46-48. 被引量:6
  • 5王琼.国际法准则与“保护的责任”——兼论西方对利比亚和叙利亚的干预[J].西亚非洲,2014(2):95-113. 被引量:11
  • 6ICISS, The Responsibility to Protect, Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 2001, p. 8.
  • 7UN Doc. A/59/565, A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, p. 66.
  • 8UN Doc. A/59/2005, In Larger Freedom: Towards Security, Development and Human Rights for All, p. 35.
  • 9UN Doc. A/RES/60/12005, World Summit Outcome,p.30.
  • 10UN Doc. A/59/2005, In Larger Freedom : Towards Security, Development and Human Rights for All, p. 35.

二级参考文献127

  • 1时殷弘,沈志雄.论人道主义干涉及其严格限制——一种侧重于伦理和法理的阐析[J].现代国际关系,2001(8):56-61. 被引量:23
  • 2李鸣.联合国安理会授权使用武力问题探究[J].法学评论,2002,20(3):66-73. 被引量:34
  • 3赵怀普.西方“人道主义干涉”政策剖析[J].欧洲,2001,19(4):6-12. 被引量:2
  • 4陈致中.《论国际法的作用》,赵宝煦,夏吉生,周忠海编.《钱端升先生纪念文集》,中国政法大学出版社2000年版,第154页.
  • 5[美]汉斯·凯尔森.《国际法原理》,第219页,华夏出版社.1989年.
  • 6See Gareth Evans, From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect, 24 Wisconsin International Law Journal 709 (2006--2007).
  • 7Speneer Zifeak, The Responsibility to Protect, in Maleolm D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3^rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 524.
  • 8Certain Expenses of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, 1962, p. 168.
  • 9Stephen P. Marks and Nicholas Cooper, Part II Human Rights: Law, Policy, and Implementation: The Responsibility to Protect: Watershed or Old Wine in a New Bottle?, 2 Jindal Global Law Review 118, 122- 123 (2010).
  • 10《常驻联合国副代表刘振民大使在联大关于"保护的责任"问题全会上的发言》,2009年7月24日,中国外交部网站,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/gxh/mtb/zwbd/t575180.htm,2010年8月25日访问.

共引文献54

同被引文献59

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部