期刊文献+

基于未确知测度的矿产预测评价方法 被引量:2

Mineral Resources Predication and Evaluation Methods Based on Uncertainty Measure Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 分析了矿产定量化预测与未确知评价的意义,针对矿产定量化预测与未确知评价存在不确定的特点,将未确知测度理论引入矿产定量化预测与未确知评价中,提出了基于未确知测度理论的矿产定量化预测与未确知综合评价模型。从实际地质条件出发,考虑影响成矿有利度的7项因素,根据实测数据建立各影响因素的未确知测度函数。该模型针对矿产定量化预测与未确知评价中的诸多不确定影响因素,根据实际情况,分别对其进行定性、定量分析,并利用信息熵理论确定了各指标权重,依照置信度识别准则对成矿有利度进行了等级判定,并对其进行了排序。将该方法应用于青海虎头崖矿田3个矿带的成矿有利度评价。研究结果表明,该方法科学合理,意义明确,为今后矿产定量化预测与未确知评价提供了一定的借鉴意义。 The significance of quantitative prediction of mineral resources and uncertainty evaluation was analyzed. Based on their uncertainty characteristics, uncertainty measure theory was introduced into quantitative prediction of mineral resources and uncertainty evaluation in this paper, and a prediction and evaluation model was proposed. Based on practical geological conditions, seven factors that influence the mineralizing favorability degree were taken into account and uncertainty measure function was established based on the in-situ data. The uncertainty problems in quantitative prediction of mineral resources and uncertainty evaluation were solved by qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, respectively. Information entropy theory was used to calculate the index weight of factors, credible degree recognition criteria were used to judge the mineralizing favorability degree, and the order was arranged. This model was emphoyed to evaluate three ore belts in Hutouya mine field in Qinghai. The results show that uncertainty measure method is reasonable and can provide reference for quantitative prediction of mineral resources and uncertainty evaluation in the future.
出处 《科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第20期49-53,共5页 Science & Technology Review
基金 中国地质调查局地质调查工作项目(1212011220937)
关键词 不确定性 矿产预测评价 虎头崖矿田 铁多金属 未确知测度 uncertainty mineral resources predication and evaluation Hutouya mine field Fe polymetallic deposit uncertainty measure
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1叶天竺.同体矿产预测评价方法技水[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2004.
  • 2Agterberg F P. Combining indicator patterns in weights of evidence model- ing resource evaluation[J]. Nonrenewable Resources, 1992, 1 (1): 39-50.
  • 3Cheng Q, Agterberg F P. Fuzzy weights of evidence method and its appli- cation in mineral potential mapping[J]. Natural Resourecs Research, 1999, 8(1): 27-35.
  • 4Ping A, wooil M M, Andy R. Applicatio~ of fuzzy set theory to integrated mineral exploration[J]. Canada of Jomnal of Exploration Geophysics, 1991, 27(1): 1-11.
  • 5Singer D A, Kouda R. Examining risk in mineral exploration[J]. Natural Resources Research, 1999, 8(2): 111-122.
  • 6An P. Spatial reasoning techniques and integration of geophysical and geo- logical information for resource exploration[D]. Manitoba: The University of Manitoba, 1992.
  • 7张善明,吕新彪,唐小春,邓国祥.矿产预测中的不确定性评估方法与应用——以广西大瑶山矿区为例[J].地球信息科学学报,2010,12(3):342-347. 被引量:4
  • 8王光远.未确知信息及其数学处理[J].哈尔滨建筑工程学院学报,1990,23(4):1-9. 被引量:339
  • 9He H J, Su S R, Wang X J, et al. Evaluation on activity of active faults based on uncertainty measure theory[J]. Disaster Advances, 2012, 5(4): 1281-1286.
  • 10刘渭,杨兴科,王守良,江万,于恒彬,何虎军.青海省祁漫塔格矿带虎头崖矿田构造控矿特征[J].中国地质,2014,41(1):222-234. 被引量:15

二级参考文献73

共引文献568

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部