期刊文献+

颅内压监测下标准大骨瓣减压与常规骨瓣减压治疗重度颅脑创伤的预后研究 被引量:6

The study of standard large craniotomy and routine craniotomy in treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries with intracranial pressure monitoring
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较颅内压监测下标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣减压术治疗重度颅脑创伤的疗效。方法122例颅脑创伤患者随机分为标准大骨瓣减压组(61例)和常规骨瓣减压组(61例),两组术后第1~7天颅内压水平比较采用t检验,并发症发生情况及伤后6个月时的预后比较采用χ2检验。结果标准大骨瓣减压组术后第3—6天颅内压显著低于同日常规骨瓣减压组患者颅内压水平[(21.63±4.62)mmHg vs.(26.85±5.21)mmHg,t=2.935,P=0.003;(23.14±3.45)mmHg1)S.(23.14±3.45)mmHg,t=3.087,P=0.002;(24.32±3.65)mmHg vs.(29,32±4.72)mmHg,t=2.911,P=0.004;(22.37±5.03)mmHg vs.(26.81±3.82)mmHg,t=2.860,P=0.005]。两组间切口疝及硬膜下积液的发生率有统计学差异(1.64% vs.11.48%,χ2=4.710,P=0.030;16.13% vs.3.28%,χ2=4.265,P=0.039)。标准大骨瓣减压组死亡率显著低于常规骨瓣减压组(11.5% vs 32.8%,χ2=8.038,P=0.005)。结论标准大骨瓣减压术虽可显著降低重度颅脑创伤患者的死亡率,但术后患者的生存质量较差。 Objective To compare the outcomes of standard large craniotomy with routine craniotomy in severe traumatic brain injured patients with intracranial pressure monitoring. Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients were randomly divided into standard large craniotomy group( 61 cases )and routine eraniotomy group(61 cases). The first 7 days intracranial pressure levels between groups were tested by t test, and outcomes of 6 months after injury were compared by x2 test. Results The intracranial pressure levels between third day and sixth day after injury in standard large craniotomy group were significantly lower than those in routine eraniotomy group[ ( 21.63± 4.62 ) mmHg vs. ( 26. 85 ± 5.21 ) mmHg, t = 2. 935, P = 0. 003 ; ( 23.14 ± 3.45 ) mmHg vs. ( 23.14 ± 3.45 ) mmHg, t = 3.087, P = O. 002 ; ( 24. 32 ± 3.65 ) mmHg vs. (29.32 ±4. 72) mmHg,t =2. 911 ,P =0. 004; (22. 37 ~5.03) mmHg vs. (26. 81 +3.82) mmHg,t =2. 860, P = 0. 005 ]. The rates of incision hernia and subdural effusion were significantly different in two groups ( 1.64% vs. 11.48% ,χ2 = 4. 710,P = 0. 030;16. 13% vs. 3.28% ,χ2 = 4. 265,P = 0. 039 ). The mortality in standard large craniotomy group were significantly lower than that in routine craniotomy group (11.5% vs. 32. 8% ,χ2 = 8. 038, P = 0. 005 ). Conclusion The standard large craniotomy can significantly reduce the mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury, but the quality of life after operation is poor.
出处 《中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版)》 2014年第3期12-15,共4页 Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition)
关键词 减压术 外科 颅内压 颅脑损伤 Decompression, surgical Intracranial pressure Craniocerebral trauma
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

共引文献145

同被引文献40

  • 1张旭伟,杭春华,陈军.标准大骨瓣与常规骨瓣治疗重型颅脑损伤临床分析[J].江苏医药,2007,33(5):464-465. 被引量:1
  • 2Bhalala OG, Pan L, Sahni V, et al. microRNA - 21 regu- lates astrocytic response following spinal cord injury[J]. J Neurosci,2012,32 (50) : 17935 - 17947.
  • 3Henshall DC. MicroRNAs in the pathophysiology and treat- ment of status epilepticus [ J]. Front Mol Neurosci,2013, (6) :37.
  • 4Bullock MR, Povlishock JT. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Editor' s Commentary[ J]. J Neurotrauma,2008,25 (3) :276 - 278.
  • 5Lei P, Li Y, Chen X, et al. Microarray based analysis of mi- croRNA expression in rat cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury[ J ]. Brain Res,2009,1284 : 191 - 201.
  • 6Redell JB,Zhao J, Dash PK. Altered expression of miRNA- 21 and its targets in the hippocampus 'after traumatic brain injury [ J ]. J Neurosci Res ,2011,89 (2) :212 - 221.
  • 7Ma XL, Liu L, Liu XX,et al. Prognostic role of microRNA -21 in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis[ J ]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2012,13 ( 5 ) : 2329 - 2334.
  • 8Truettner JS, Alonsol OF, Bramlett HM, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia alters microRNA responses to traumatic brain injury in rats [ J ]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2011,31 (9) :1897 - 1907.
  • 9张建永,刘保华,陆海,袁璞.标准大骨瓣减压术后颅腔容积代偿能力的探讨[J].中华神经外科杂志,2008,24(1):78-78. 被引量:63
  • 10徐武,梁维邦,倪红斌,杨咏波.大骨瓣减压在重度颅脑损伤中应用的实验研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2008,5(1):23-26. 被引量:9

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部