期刊文献+

爱丁堡产后抑郁量表在广州市城区产妇的临界值研究 被引量:22

A Study of the Critical Value of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Delivery Women in Urban Areas in Guangzhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(Edinburgh postpartum depression scale, EPDS)在广州市城区产妇产后抑郁症(postpartum depression, PPD)初步筛查中的临界值。方法采取分层抽样法,抽取广州市天河区3所医院2013年5月1日—9月30日入院的产妇1428例,于产后第3-7天采用中文版 EPDS 测评,同时采用 Beck 抑郁问卷(BDI)作为参照标准,计算 EPDS 各临界值的灵敏度、特异度及 Youden 指数,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积。结果以 BDI 为参照标准,调查对象中发生 PPD 293例(20.52%),其中轻度抑郁163例、中度抑郁98例、重度抑郁32例。经过 ROC 曲线测试,EPDS 用于该地区 PPD 筛查的适宜标准为:10-12分为轻度产后抑郁,13-15分为中度产后抑郁,≥16分为重度产后抑郁。结论建立适合各地区经济生活条件的 PPD 筛查临界值,有助于提高 PPD 筛查和诊断的准确性。 Objective To explore the critical value of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in primary screening of postpartum depression (PPD) in delivery women in urban areas in Guangzhou. Methods A total of 1428 delivery women in three hospitals from May 1 to September 30, 2013 in Tianhe district in Guangzhou were detected with the Chinese version of EPDS on postpartum 3rd -7th d. At the same time, Beck depression inventory (BDI) was adopted as reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden indexes of all critical values in EPDS were calculated, and receiver operating curve (ROC) of the subject were drawn up, and then area under curve was also calculated. Results Based on the BDI standard, 293 delivery women had PPD (20. 52% ), in which 163 women were mild, 98 women were moderate and 32 women were severe. The critical values of EPDS in screening of PPD in urban areas in Guangzhou were as follows 10 - 12 score was mild PPD, 13 - 15 score was moderate PPD and the score higher than 16 was severe PPD by ROC detection. Conclusion It's necessary to establish critical values of PPD, which can fit in economic and living condition in every city and to improve the accuracy of the screening and diagnosis of PPD.
出处 《临床误诊误治》 2014年第7期101-104,共4页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20131A011181)
关键词 爱丁堡产后抑郁量表 抑郁症 产后 临界值 广州 Edinburg postnatal depression scale Depression,postpartum Critical value Guangzhou
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1彭博,廖继武,潘集阳.产后抑郁的临床特征及治疗进展[J].实用医学杂志,2012,28(18):2991-2993. 被引量:19
  • 2钱耀荣,晏晓颖.中国产后抑郁发生率的系统分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(12):1-3. 被引量:147
  • 3Lee D T, Yip S K, Chiu H F, et al. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women. Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale[ J]. Br J Psychiatry, 1998,172:433-437.
  • 4张深山,叶凯文,林芬,李林娜.影响产妇心身健康因素的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(23):4231-4232. 被引量:6
  • 5Ambrosini A, Stanghellini G. Myths of motherhood. The role of culture in the development of postpartum depression [ J ]. Ann Ist Super Sanita, 2012,48 ( 3 ) :277-286.
  • 6Halbreich U, Karkun S. Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms[J]. J Affect Disord, 2006,91 (1-2) :97-111.
  • 7Kheirabadi G R, Maracy M R, Akbaripour S, et al. Psycho- metric properties and diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in a sample of Iranian women[ J ]. Iran J Med Sci, 2012,37(1):32-38.
  • 8Alvarado-Esquivel C, Sifuentes-Alvarez A, Salas-Martinnez C, et al. Validation of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale in a polulation of puerperal women in Mexico[J]. Clin Pract Epidemoil Merit Health, 2006,29(2):33-43.
  • 9Wang Y, Guo X, Lau Y, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale[ J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009,46(6) :812-823.
  • 10高明,王智慧,傅晓红,陆丽艳.产后抑郁筛查量表中文版在产后抑郁筛查中的应用[J].海南医学,2013,24(14):2080-2082. 被引量:13

二级参考文献59

  • 1黄培红.社会支持对产后抑郁的影响[J].现代医院,2006,6(7):142-143. 被引量:5
  • 2吴文源.症状自评量表(SCL-90).中国行为医学科学,2001,10:118-121.
  • 3Cox J L, Holden J M, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the item edinburgh postnatal depression scale [Jl. Br J Psychiatry, 1987,150:782-786.
  • 4O' Hara M W, Swain A M. Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta analysis [J]. Int Rev Psychiatry, 1996,8: 37-54.
  • 5龚耀先 修订.艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南医学院,1986.1-44.
  • 6张亚林 杨德森.生活事件量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13:101-103.
  • 7张作记.行为医学量表手册[J][J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10:19-24.
  • 8中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(CCMD-3)[M].3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:87-89;10-12
  • 9肖水源.社会支持评定量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:127-127.
  • 10Gaynes B N, Gavin N, Mehzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal deprepression : prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes [J]. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ), 2005, (119):1-8.

共引文献195

同被引文献248

引证文献22

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部