期刊文献+

不同16S rDNA靶序列PCR-DGGE分析油页岩细菌多样性 被引量:3

Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Oil Shale by PCR-DGGE with Different 16S rDNA Target Sequences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为全面了解油页岩细菌群落组成结构,同时筛选出适于油页岩PCR-DGGE的最佳引物,采用改进SDS高盐提取法,提取抚顺西露天矿油页岩微生物总DNA,并用968F/1401R,338F/518R,341F/907R和1055F/1406R,对16S rDNA V6-V8,V3,V8和V9区进行PCR-DGGE分析.结果表明,4组引物均能较好扩增出目的基因,但不同靶序列对多样性检出有显著影响(P<0.001);与其他引物相比,968F/1401R和338F/518R获得的指纹图谱物种丰富度更高,检出细菌类群更丰富,较适合油页岩样品.油页岩细菌群落组成较简单,优势细菌包括不动杆菌属、假单胞菌属和埃希氏菌属,同时还有假单胞菌目和肠杆菌目尚未被鉴定的一些种类. For a comprehensive understanding of bacterial community structure of the oil shale from Fushun west open-pit mine in China and screening out best prime for PCR-DGGE analysis of oil shale,an improved SDS-high-salt extraction method was used to extract microbial total DNA from the oil shale.Four-set primers(968 F /1401R,338 F /518R,341 F /907R and 1055 F /1406R)of 16 S rDNA high variable target regions,V6-V8,V3,V8,V9,were compared to obtain the optimal target sequences suitable for PCR-DGGE.The results from PCR-DGGE patterns showed that four-set primers can amplify the target sequences,but different target sequences of primers have a significant effect on the detection of the bacterial diversity(P〈0.001).Compared with the other primers,968 F /1401R and 338 F /518R are more suitable for the bacterial diversity analysis of oil shale samples due to higher finger-print species richness and abundant bacteria group obtained from their PCR-DGGE.The community structure of bacteria in oil shale is not much rich.Acinetobacter,Pseudomonas and Escherichia are the dominant bacterial communities,as well as some unidentified bacterium which belong to Pseudomonadales and Enterobacteriales.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期1033-1038,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51204055) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20100481205)
关键词 油页岩 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE 细菌多样性 靶序列 oil shale 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE bacterial diversity target sequences
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Bekoski V P, Mill J, Mandi B, et al. Removal of organically bound sulfur from oil shale by iron (1II)-ion generated- regenerated from pyrite by the action of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans-research on a model system [ J ]. Hydrometallurgy, 2008,94 ( 1/2/3/4 ) : 8 - 13.
  • 2Haddadin M S Y, Arqoub A A A, Reesh I A, et al. Kinetics of hydrocarbon extraction from oil shale using biosurfactant producing bacteria[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009,50 (4) :983 - 990.
  • 3Kim J S, Crowley D E. Microbial diversity in natural asphalts of the Rancho La Brea Tar Pits [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology ,2007,73 ( 14 ) :4579 - 4591.
  • 4Permanyer A,Gallego J L R, Caja M A, et al. Crude oilbiodegradation and environmental factors at the Riutort oil shale mine, Se Pyrenees[J] Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2010,33(2) :123 - 140.
  • 5Matlakowska R, Sklodowska A. Biodegradation of kupferschiefer black shale organic matter (Fore-Sudetic Monocline, Poland ) by indigenous microorganisms [ J ]. Chemosphere ,2011,83 (9) : 1255 - 1261.
  • 6Watanabe K, Kodama Y, Harayama S. Design and evaluation of PCR primers to amplify bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA fragments used for community fingerprinting[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2001,44 ( 3 ) :253 - 262.
  • 7Brons J K, van Elsas J D. Analysis of bacterial communities in soil by use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and clone libraries, as influenced by different reverse primers [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74 ( 9 ) : 2717 - 2727.
  • 8蒋绍妍,王文星,薛向欣,侯晓娇.油页岩微生物总DNA的提取方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2014,35(4):588-592. 被引量:3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Tammeoja T, Reinsalu E. Forecast of Estonian oil shale usage for power generation J 1. Oil Shale,2008,25 ( 2 ) : 115 - 124.
  • 2Voordouw G,Armsrong S M,Reimer M F,et al. Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from oil field microbial communities indicates the presence of a variety of sulfate-reducing, femntative, and sulfide-oxidizing bacteria E J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996,62(5 ) : 1623 - 1629.
  • 3Matlakowska R, Narkiewicz W, Sklodowska A. Biotransformation of organic-rich copper-bearing black shale by indigenous microorganisms isolated from Lubin copper mine ( Poland ) [ J 1. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,44 (7) :2433 - 2440.
  • 4Matlakowska R, Sklodowska A. Biodegradation of kupferschiefer black shale organic matter (Fore-Sudetic Monocline, Poland ) by indigenous microorganisms [ J 1. Chemosphere,2011,83 ( 9 ) : 1255 - 1261.
  • 5Zhou J,Bruns M A,Tiedje J M. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition I J 1- Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996,62 ( 2 ) :316 - 322.
  • 6Proteous L A, Armstrong J L, Seidler R J, et al. An effective method to extract DNA from environmental sample for polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA fingerprint analysis E J 1. Current Microbiology, 1994,29 (5) : 301 - 307.
  • 7Dojka M A, Harris J K, Pace N R. Expanding the known diversity and environmental distribution of an uncultured phylogenetic division of bacteria [ J 1- Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2000,66 (4) : 1617 - 1621.
  • 8Tsai Y L, Olson B H. Rapid method for direct extraction of DNA from soil and sediments [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991,57 (4) : 1070 - 1074.
  • 9徐晓皎,曹成有,崔振波,杨敏.风沙土微生物总DNA不同提取和纯化方法比较[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1327-1333. 被引量:1
  • 10张颖,曹成有.一种直接用于PCR分析的风沙土微生物总DNA提取方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(11):1640-1643. 被引量:2

共引文献2

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部