期刊文献+

多种Logit路径选择模型对多层次交通网络的性能影响

Impacts of Logit Route Choice Models on Performance of Hierarchical Traffic Network
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究了多种Logit路径选择模型应用于多层次交通网络时对网络性能的影响。依据网络层次特征定义了广义路径费用;选取4种典型的Logit模型——单层的多项式Logit(MNL),C-Logit(CL),Path-Size Logit(PSL)以及双层的交叉巢式Logit(CNL)模型,对它们分别构建了适用于多层次网络的等价数学规划模型(MP);对不同层次结构和分散参数取值,利用VC++编程求解4个等价数学规划模型,并计算了系统最优的流量分配。分析表明:3种OD需求下的所有Logit模型所得网络总行程时间费用(NTTC)都高于通过系统最优分配得到的NTTC;利用考虑重叠的CL、PSL、CNL模型所得NTTC皆大于不考虑重叠的MNL模型,且构造越复杂的Logit模型所得NTTC越高;对各个Logit模型而言,层次性交通网络的NTTC要小于没有层次性的情况且层次越高时NTTC越小。 The impact of a variety of Logit route choice models on network performance when they are applied to hierarchical transportation network is studied. The generalized path cost is defined based on network hierarchical feature. Four Logit models, i. e. , the models of single-level muhinomial Logit (MNL) , C-Logit (CL), Path-Size Logit (PSL), and bi- level cross nested Logit (CNL), are selected. The equivalent mathematical programming (MP) models of the 4 Logit models for hierarchical network are established respectively, which are solved with VC + + in the cases of different hierarchical levels and different dispersion parameter values, and the flow patterns of system optima (SO) are also calculated. The analysis shows that ( 1 ) for three kinds of OD demand, the total network travel time costs (NTTCs) resulted from all of these Logit models are higher than that obtained by the system optimal assignment method; (2) CL, PSL and CNL models that consider overlapping routes produce greater NTTCs than MNL model that does not consider overlapping, and the Logit model with more complex structure results in higher NTTC ; (3) for each Logit model, NTFCs of hierarchical transport networks are less than the case without hierarchy, and the higher the hierarchical level, the smaller the value of NTTC.
出处 《公路交通科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期129-134,共6页 Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71071165) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51238008) 江西省科技支撑计划项目(20133BBG70104)
关键词 交通工程 交通网络 层次特征 Logit路径选择模型 数学规划 行程时间 traffic engineering: traffic network hierarchical feature Logit route choice model mathematical programming travel time
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1KOUTSOUPIAS E, PAPADIMITRIOU C. Worst-case Equilibria [ J ]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999, 1563 : 404 -413.
  • 2石超峰,徐寅峰.交通网络效率损失上界的估计方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(5):945-947. 被引量:3
  • 3曾明华,肖瑜,黄细燕.多层次交通网络的UE与SO混合均衡与效率损失[J].华东交通大学学报,2012,29(2):57-62. 被引量:4
  • 4DOMENCICH T, MCFADDEN D. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis [ M ]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1975.
  • 5CASCETTA E, NUZZOLO A, RUSSO F, et al. A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems: Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks [ C ] // Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Lyon, France: Elsevier Science, 1996: 697 - 711.
  • 6BEN-AKIVA M, BIERLAIRE M. Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions [ M]. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 1999 : 5 - 33.
  • 7PRASHKER J N, BEKHOR S. Investigation of Stochastic Network Loading Procedures [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 1645 : 94 - 102.
  • 8BIERLAIRE M. A Theoretical Analysis of the Cross-nested Logit Model [ J ]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 144 (1): 287-300.
  • 9李军,赖信君,余志.基于Probit等效阻抗的配对组合Logit路径选择模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2013,13(4):100-105. 被引量:5
  • 10曾明华,李夏苗.多层次多模式综合交通网络设计研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(2):23-29. 被引量:8

二级参考文献70

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部