期刊文献+

临床优质护理在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用及效果观察 被引量:16

The effect and the application of clinical quality nurse care in patients with severe traumatic brain Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨临床优质护理服务对重型颅脑损伤患者的效果。方法 82例重型颅脑损伤患者,随机分为护理组(41例)与对照组(41例),对照组给予常规重型颅脑外伤护理;护理组给予综合优质护理,包括密切观察患者的生命体征、保证患者呼吸道通畅、脑侧裂池引流管的护理、基础护理、营养支持、冬眠疗法、功能锻炼及心理及辅助治疗等。患者出院后3个月,采用GOS分级判定标准判断康复情况。结果护理组病死率(14.63%)显著低于对照组(43.90%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.48,P<0.05)。护理组恢复情况(62.9%)显著优于对照组(26.1%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=7.52,P<0.05);2组中度致残率与重度致残率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床综合优质护理服务可明显降低重型颅脑损伤患者的病死率,并能提高患者的恢复率,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To study the effects of clinical quality nurse care in patients with severe traumatic brain inju-ry.Methods 82 patients with severe traumatic brain injury were randomly divided into care group (n=41) and control group (n=41) ,the control group received conventional care of severe head trauma ;care group received comprehensive quality care ,in-cluding closely observing the patient's vital signs ,ensuring patients airway to be unobstructed ,brain sylvian cistern drainage tube care ,basic care ,nutritional support ,hibernation therapy ,functional training and psychological and adjuvant therapy.3 months after hospital discharge ,the GOS grading criteria was used to judge the rehabilitation of patients.Results At the end of treat-ment ,the mortality of care group(14.63% ) was significantly lower than that of the control group (43.90% ) ,and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =8.48 ,P0.05).Conclusion The clinical comprehensive quality care can significantly reduce mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain in-jury ,and improve the patient's recovery rate ,and is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《中国实用神经疾病杂志》 2014年第12期10-12,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
关键词 护理 颅脑损伤 Care T raumatic brain injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献26

共引文献35

同被引文献131

  • 1秦兴国.有关颅内压监护在重型颅脑损伤诊治的应用分析[J].现代养生,2014,0(2):91-92. 被引量:1
  • 2叶丙莲,肖建宁.采血标本注血方法的探讨[J].实用中西医结合临床,2005,5(3):76-76. 被引量:7
  • 3Alarcon JD, Rubiano AM, Chirinos MS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with severe traumatic hrain injury: A systematic evaluation of their quality[J]. The jom~lal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2013, 75(2): 311-319.
  • 4Kelley E, Sullivan C, Loughlin JK, et al. Self-awareness and neurobehavioral outcomes, 5 years or more after moderate to severe brain injury[J]. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 2014, 29(2): 147-152.
  • 5Sharma S, DeMestral C, Hsiao M, et al. Benchmarking trauma center performance in traumatic brain injury: The limilations of mortality outcmnes[J]. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2013, 74(3): 890-894.
  • 6Nickele CM, Kamps TK, Medow JE. Safety of a DVT ehemoprophylaxis protocol following traumatic brain injury: a single center quality improvement initiative[J]. Neurocritical Cm~, 2013, 18(2): 184-192.
  • 7Tepas JJ 3rd, Praeht EE, Orban BL, et al. High-volume trauma cente~ have better outcomes treating traumatic brain injury[J], The journal of trauma and acute care, surgery, 2013, 74(1): 143-148.
  • 8Hofhuis JG, Spronk PE. Health-related quality of life and influence of age after trauma: An overview[J]. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2014, 76(2): 549-556.
  • 9Alali AS, Scales DC, Fowler HA, et al.Tracbeostomy timing in traumatic brain injury: A propensity-matched cohort study[J]. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2014, 76(1): 70-78. DO[: 10. I097/TA.0b013e3182aSfd6a.
  • 10Hofhuis JG, Spronk PE. Health-related quality of life and influence of age after trauma: An overview[J]. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2014, 76(2): 549-556.

引证文献16

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部