期刊文献+

体性民族志:基于中国传统文化语法的探索 被引量:23

Ethnography of Self-Substance:A Research Based on the Chinese Cultural Grammar
原文传递
导出
摘要 人类学对民族志范式的求索始于学科诞生之日。民族志范式,如哲学之认识论、本体论和方法论,本为一体,难以泾渭。人类学降于西方,西方范式引领在先。以学科史上几个阶段的讨论观之,"科学/艺术"、"客观/主观"、"实证/阐释"、"客位/主位"等二元对峙的阴影一路伴随;今日"身体一介体"似有超越,值得深究。中国文化自成一体,"天地人"三才、三维、三位的形制为文化体性的根本。中国民族志"本土化"讨论已有时日,仍步"西方范式"后尘,只在"表象"上求解,未达"脉理"之本。本文从中国本位体察,以"王"、"参"、"品"为关键词,以体性之于民族志关系进行讨论。 The exploration of the paradigm of ethnography was started from the beginning of anthropology itself.The paradigm of ethnography was an inseparable whole,which was similar to the phenomenon in philosophy that epistemology,ontology and methodology are integrated.Anthropology was originated from the western world,so western paradigm of ethnography was leading the exploration for centuries,accompanying with the dualism of science and art,objective and subjective,experimental and interpreting,etic and emic,etc.The study of body-medium seemed to go beyond this restriction.Chinese culture is a self-contained integrity,with the root of three dimensions.The localization of ethnography in China has a long history,yet still follows the footsteps of western paradigm.This paper is about an attempt of establishing China' s self-substantial ethnographical methodology from the study of three key words of Wang,Can,Pin.
作者 彭兆荣
出处 《民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期58-64,124-125,共7页 Ethno-National Studies
关键词 民族志 文化体性 ethnography cultural self-substance Wang Can Pin
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1[美]保罗·拉比诺:《表征就是社会事实:人类学中的现代性与后现代性》,[美]詹姆斯·克利福德、乔治·E·马库斯编:《写文化-民族志的诗学与政治学》,商务印书馆,2006年,第312-314页.
  • 2[美]保罗·拉比诺著、高丙中等译:《摩洛哥田野作业反思》中译本序,商务印书馆2008年版,第8-9页.
  • 3P. Rabinow et al, Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary, Durham & London.. Duke University Press, 2008, pp. 11-12.
  • 4P. Rabinow et al, Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary, p. 30.
  • 5P. Rabinow et al, Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary, p. 36.
  • 6[法]马塞尔·莫斯等著、纳丹·施郎格选编、蒙养山人译:《论技术、技艺与文明》,世界图书出版公司2010年版,第78-79页.
  • 7M. Foueault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Trans. by Alan Sheridan), New York: Random House, 1979 ,pp. 47- 49.
  • 8M. Foueault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Trans. by Alan Sheridan), p. 221.
  • 9P. Bourdieu, Outline of A Theory ofPraetice, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1977,p. 72.
  • 10[法]皮埃尔·布迪厄,1998,《实践与反思-反思社会学导引》,中央编译出版社.

二级参考文献5

同被引文献211

引证文献23

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部