期刊文献+

公众、政府、企业共同参与排污权交易的有效性研究 被引量:4

Effectiveness of Emissions Trading Concerning the Jointly Participations of the Public,Government and Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 排污权交易是控制环境污染非常重要和有效的环境经济手段,论文首先从产权、公共事务民主治理以及环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)这三个角度论述了公众、政府、企业三方共同参与排污权交易的依据;运用环境经济学的方法论证了三方的共同参与能有效解决排污权市场失灵的问题,使排污权价格能实现地区整体企业成本一效益的最优化;最后,阐述了如果政府和公众能参与到排污权市场的交易,就可以改变地区污染物的排放总量或影响排污权交易,从而提高各自的满意度。 The emissions trading is an important and effective means to control the environmental pollution. This paper firstly discusses the ground of jointly participation of the public, government and enterprises in emissions trading from the perspectives of property right, democratic administering of public affairs and the positivism analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curve. In addition, the paper demonstrates that the jointly participations of the public, government and enterprises could effectively solve the marketing dysfunction of emissions trading based on proof of environmental economics, which maximize the cost-effectiveness of enterprises by optimizing the price of emissions permit. At last, it shows if it is possible to join in the trading of emissions marketing, government and the pubiic could change emissions volume or influence the emissions trading, and increase the satisfaction of each other.
出处 《经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期66-70,共5页 Research on Economics and Management
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“我国市级发展规划编制中的公众参与机制研究”(13&ZD176)
关键词 排污权交易 公众、政府与企业共同参与 成本最小化操纵 排他性操纵 Emissions Trading Jointly Participations of the Public, Government and Enterprises Operation of Minimi-zing Cost Operation of Exclusiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1王金南.二氧化硫排放交易:美国的经验与中国的前景[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2000.
  • 2林健枝.香港环境规划过程中的理性、信任、环境公义及地方利益的考量[R].复旦大学,2013.
  • 3安丽.基于可持续发展的排污权交易有效性研究[D].天津:天津大学,2009.17-63.
  • 4Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality:Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence [ R ]. Background Paper for World Development Report, Washington D. C. , USA : World Bank, 1992.
  • 5朱群芳.人口、资源与环境经济学概论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013.
  • 6Dallas B. Appraisal of the SO2 Cap-and-Trade Market[ Z]. Chicago :University of Iillinois ,2000.
  • 7Grossman G, Krueger A. Economic Growth and the Environment[J]. Quarter/y Journal of Economics, 1995,110 (2) : 353 - 337.
  • 8Magnani E. The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Environmental Protection Policy and Income Distribution [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2000 ( 32 ) : 431 -444.
  • 9张孝廷.环境污染、集体抗争与行动机制:以长三角地区为例[J].甘肃理论学刊,2013(2):21-26. 被引量:2
  • 10张帆.环境与自然资源经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997..

二级参考文献26

  • 1张玉林.政经一体化开发机制与中国农村的环境冲突[J].探索与争鸣,2006(5):26-28. 被引量:145
  • 2Cramton, P. and S. Kerr. Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction not Grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30 : 333- 345.
  • 3Svendsen, G. T. and J. L. Christensen. The US S02 Auction: Analysis and Generalization[J]. Energy Economics, 1999,21:403-416.
  • 4Tietenberg T. H.. Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1991(6): 125-178.
  • 5Misiolek, W.S. and H. W. Elder. Exclusionary Manipulation of Markets for Pollution Rights[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, (16) : 156- 166.
  • 6Godby, R.. Market Power in Laboratory Emission Permit Markets[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23: 279-318.
  • 7Van Egteren, H. and M. Weber. Marketable Permits, Market Power, and Cheating[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30 : 161 - 17a.
  • 8Stavins, R. N.. Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995, 29: 133-148.
  • 9Cason, T. N. and L. Gandgadharan. Transactions Cost in Tradeable Permit Markets: an Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs[J]. Journal of Regulation Economics 2003, 23(2): 145-165.
  • 10Gangadharan, L.. Transaction Costs in Pollution Markets: an Empirical Study[J]. Land Economics, 2000, 76(4) : 601-614.

共引文献76

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部