期刊文献+

优良品德学习何以使人幸福——美德伦理学复兴的文化哲学解析 被引量:9

Why Character Strengths Could Promote People's Happiness——Analysis from the View of Cultural Philosophy of Virtue Ethics
原文传递
导出
摘要 因应"人何以幸福"这一亘古弥新的问题,20世纪中期复兴的美德伦理学催生了积极心理学,开启了幸福为本的优良品德学习研究新方向。"优良品德学习何以使人幸福"论题内含何以可能、何以可求、何以可致以及何以可成四个问题,关涉文化哲学的进化论、价值论、主体论和活动论四个层面的理性致思。其中,凭借历时进化的美德伦理学复兴和优良品德分类体系开发,奠定了何以可能的历史进化论基础;基于价值实现的希望论和幸福识建论,阐明了何以可求的理想价值论概念;依靠自主能动的自我决定论和时光再构法,形成了何以可致的自觉主体论原理;而通过文化交互的感恩论和持久幸福感模型,则建构了何以可成的多维交互论原则。 "How to get happiness" is a long-lasting question. Tile revival of virtue ethics led by positive psychology has initiated a new study of happiness-centered character strengths education. The topic of "why character strengths could promote people's happiness" consists at least of four questions of why it is possible, how it is pursued, how it is accessed and how it is realized, which, however, might be answered respectively through four fields of cultural philosophy in terms of evolutionism, axiology, subjectivity theory and activity theory. From criticism on scientism, the revival of virtue ethics promotes development of virtue taxonomy, laying foundations of the historical evolutionism for why it is possible. For the value realization, the hope theory and the construal theory of happiness have clarified conceptions of ideal axiologs' for how it is pursued. Building on self-conscious activity, the self-decision theory and the day reconstruction method have constructed axioms of dynamic subjectivity theory for how it is accessed. And based on cultural interaction, the gratitude theory and the sustainable happiness model have provided principles of multi-dimensional interactions for how it is realized.
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期15-24,共10页 Educational Research
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划2010年度后期资助项目"学习化课程论稿--课程文化哲学初探"(项目编号:GD10HJY01)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 优良品德 学习 幸福 美德伦理学 文化哲学 character strength, happiness, virtue ethics, cultural philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1瓦迪斯瓦夫·塔塔尔克威茨,漆玲.道德与幸福关系理论的历史考察[J].道德与文明,1999,(13).
  • 2恩斯特·卡西尔.人论[M].李琛,译.北京:光明日报出版社.2009:27.
  • 3鲁道夫·奥伊肯.生活的意义与价值[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1997.1.
  • 4Linley, P. A., et al. Positive Psychology:Past, Present, and (Possible) Future [ J ]. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2006, ( 1 ).
  • 5诺斯拉特·佩塞施基安.积极心理治疗:一种新方法的理论和实践[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.119.
  • 6Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. P. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification [M]. New York: Oxford University Press Washington, 204: 35-40.
  • 7兰德曼 阎嘉译.哲学人类学[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版,1998..
  • 8Snyder, C. R., et al. The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual-differences Measure of Hope [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, (4).
  • 9Snyder, C. R. Hope Theory: Rainbows in the Mind [J]. Psychological Inquiry., 2002, (4).
  • 10张青方,郑日昌.希望理论:一个新的心理发展视角[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16(6):430-433. 被引量:60

二级参考文献15

  • 1黄明理.杜威论道德与人性[J].学海,1998(1):80-83. 被引量:4
  • 2肖群忠.人性与道德关系新探[J].甘肃社会科学,2001(5):12-18. 被引量:21
  • 3冯建军.主体教育的历史透视[J].南通大学学报(教育科学版),2005,21(4):1-4. 被引量:4
  • 4[德]赫尔巴特.教育学讲授纲要[M].李其龙,译.北京:人民教育出版社.1989:23.
  • 5[捷]夸美纽斯.大教学论[M].傅任敢,译.北京:人民教育出版社,1999.
  • 6中国大百科全书:教育卷[K].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1985.
  • 7[英]莱斯利.史蒂文森.人性七论[M].袁荣生,等,译.北京:商务印书馆,1999:4.
  • 8韦政通.中国思想传统的改造转化[M]//韦政通自选集.昆明:云南人民出版社,2002:256.
  • 9南京师范大学教育系.教育学[M].北京:人民出版社,1984..
  • 10鲁洁.德育新论[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2000.66.

共引文献283

同被引文献46

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部