期刊文献+

肌壁间、粘膜下与浆膜下子宫肌瘤超声消融疗效比较及12个月随访结果 被引量:7

Ultrasound- guided focused ultrasound ablation of intramural, submucosal and subserosal uterine fibroids: 12-month follow-up results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较肌壁间、粘膜下和浆膜下子宫肌瘤超声消融治疗的效果及差异。方法前瞻性研究应用超声消融治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的疗效,用MRI评估肌瘤体积消融率及治疗后6、12个月的体积变化,使用症状严重程度评分表(SSS)评估患者临床症状变化情况。结果2011年8月-2012年12月单中心110例患者145个肌瘤纳入本研究,其中肌壁间肌瘤72(49.7%),粘膜下肌瘤49(33.8%),浆膜下肌瘤24(16.6%)。治疗后体积消融率分别为(93.2±13.1)%、(94.9±9.3)%和(89.6±19.3)%,不同类型肌瘤体积消融率无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。治疗后6个月、12个月体积分别缩小(47.3±20.8)%、(70.3±22.2)%、(47.8±13.6)%和(58.9±19.9)%、(82.0±21.2)%、(50.5±17.8)%,粘膜下肌瘤体积缩小率大于肌壁间与浆膜下肌瘤(P〈0.05)。临床症状分别以肌壁间、粘膜下和浆膜下肌瘤为主的患者治疗前SSS评分分别为(29.1±15.2)、(34.8±14.5)、(26.6±23.4),治疗后6个月和12个月SSS评分分别为(18.4±15.8)、(15.5±10.7)、(11.6±11.7)和(18.9±13.2)、(16.8±14.0)、(11.5±9.1),与治疗前相比差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。所有患者均无严重并发症发生。结论超声消融治疗肌壁间、粘膜下和浆膜下肌瘤均获得了较高的体积消融率,术后6、12个月随访肌瘤体积缩小和临床症状改善显著,可以为有保留子宫意愿的肌瘤患者提供一种新的治疗选择。 Objective To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided focused ultrasound ablation (US-FUA) in the treatment of intramural, submucosal and subserosal uterine fibroids. Methods We prospectively assessed the efficacy of US-FUA for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids by determining the volume ablation ratio immediately after the treatment and evaluating the volume changes of the uterine fibroids on contrast-enhanced MRI at 6 and 12 months after the treatment. The symptom severity score (SSS) was examined before and at 6 and 12 months after the treatment. Results A total of 110 women with 145 symptomatic fibroids undergoing US-FUA between August 2011 and December 2012 were enrolled. The fibroids were located intramurally in 72 (49.7%), submucosally in 49 (33.8%) and subserosally in 24 (16.6%) patients, who had comparable mean volume ablation ratios [(93.2 ± 13.1)% vs (94.9 ± 9.3)% vs (89.6 ± 19.3)%, P〉0.05]. The volume of the treated fibroids was reduced by (47.3± 20.8)%, (70.3 ± 22.2)%and (47.8 ± 13.6)%at 6 months after US-FUA and by (58.9 ± 19.9)%, (82.0 ± 21.2)%, and (50.5±17.8)%at 12 months, respectively, demonstrating a more obvious volume reduction for submucosal fibroids (P〈0.05). The SSS scores of the 3 groups before treatment were 29.1±15.2, 34.8±14.5 and 26.6±23.4, respectively, which decreased significantly to 18.4 ± 15.8, 15.5 ± 10.7, and 11.6 ± 11.7 at 6 months (P〈0.05) and to 18.9 ± 13.2, 16.8 ± 14.0, 11.5 ± 9.1 at 12 months (P〈0.05). No major complications occurred in these patients during the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions US-FUA can yield high ablation ratios for intramural, submucosal and subserosal fibroids and result in significant volume reduction and symptomatic improvement at 6 and 12 months after the treatment, suggesting its value as a new noninvasive option for fibroid treatment in patients who wish to preserve the uterus.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期978-982,共5页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2011BAI14B01)~~
关键词 子宫肿瘤 平滑肌瘤 超声消融 uterine neoplasms fibroids focused ultrasound ablation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Falcone T,Parker WH. Surgical management of leiomyomas for fertility or uterine preservation[J].OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY,2013,(04):856-868.
  • 2Incidence OS. Aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids[J].Best Practice Research Clinical Obstetrics Gynaecology,2008,(04):571-588.
  • 3Hindley J,Gedroyc WM,Regan L. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids:early results[J].AJR American Journal of Roentgenology,2004,(06):1713-1719.
  • 4Gorny KR,Woodrum DA,Brown DL. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound of uterine leiomyomas:review of a 12-month outcome of 130 clinical patients[J].Vasc Interv Radiol,2011,(06):857-864.
  • 5Dobrotwir A,Pun E. Clinical 24 month experience of the first MRgFUS Unit for treatment of uterine fibroids in Australia[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2012,(04):409-416.
  • 6陈文直,唐良萏,杨武威,张彦,李静,夏文秀,周洁敏,祝宝让,赵纯全,令狐华,陈锦云,朱丽,邓勇斌,王智彪.超声消融治疗子宫肌瘤的安全性及有效性[J].中华妇产科杂志,2010,45(12):909-912. 被引量:87
  • 7Funaki K,Fukunishi H,Funaki T. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids:relationship between the therapeutic effects and signal intensity of preexisting T2-weighted magnetic resonance images[J].AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY,2007,(02):184.e1-184.e6.
  • 8Zhao WP,Chen JY,Zhang L. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound ablating uterine fibroids with hyperintense on T2-weighted MR imaging[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY,2013,(01):e43-e49.
  • 9Wang W,Wang Y,Wang T. Safety and efficacy of US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of submucosal fibroids[J].European Radiology,2012,(11):2553-2558.
  • 10王婷,汪伟,陈文直,王月香,叶慧义,唐杰.超声消融治疗子宫黏膜下肌瘤的安全性和疗效评价[J].中华妇产科杂志,2011,46(6):407-411. 被引量:20

二级参考文献25

  • 1高强度聚焦超声肿瘤治疗系统临床应用指南(试行)[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(12):796-797. 被引量:58
  • 2Stewart EA,Gostout B,Rabinovici J,et al.Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery.Obstet Gynecol,2007,110:279-287.
  • 3Hanafi M.Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy.Obstet Gyneco1,2005,105:877-881.
  • 4Hindley J,Gedroyc WM,Regan L,et al.MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids:early results.Am J Roentgenol,2004,183:1713-1719.
  • 5Ravina JH,Aymard A,Ciraru-Vigneron N,et al.Uterine fibroids embolization:results about 454 cases.Gynecol Obstet Fertil,2003,31:597-605.
  • 6Orsini LF,Salardi S,Pilu G,et aL Pelvic organs in premenarcheal girls:real-time ultrasonography.Radiology,1984,153:113-116.
  • 7Spies JB,Coyne K,Guaou N,et aL The UFS-QOL,a new diseasespecific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata.Obstet Gynecol,2002,99:290-300.
  • 8Sacks D,McClenny TE,Cardella JF,et al.Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines.J Vasc lnterv Radiol,2003,14:199-202.
  • 9Stewart EA,Gostout B,Rabinovici J,et al.Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery.Obstet Gynecol,2007,110:279 -287.
  • 10陈锦云.超声消融于宫肌瘤的临床剂量学研究[D/OL].重庆:重庆医科大学,2009[2010-10-22].www.cnki.com.cn.

共引文献101

同被引文献42

  • 1周崑,熊正爱.聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(1):66-67. 被引量:10
  • 2Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimborg S, et al. Robotic - assisted, laparoscopie, and abdominal myomeetomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes . Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 117(2, Part 1 ) : 256 - 266.
  • 3Einarsson JI, Chavan NR, Suzuki Y, et al. Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of periopera- tive outcomes, safety, and efficacy . Journal of Minimally lnvasive Gynecology, 2011, 18(1) : 92 -95.
  • 4Onwuzuruike B, Hamoudi R, Okolo S. Hysterescopic injection of vasopressin during hysteroscopie myomectomy - a novel technique for large or multiple submucosal fibroids. International Journal of Obstet- rics and Gyaaecology, 2012(119) : 216.
  • 5Pundir J, Pundir V, Walavalkar R, et al. Robotic - assisted laparo- scopic vs abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy: Systematic review and meta - analysis . Journal of Minimally lnvasive Gynecology, 2013, 20(3) : 335 -345.
  • 6Weibel HS, Jarcevic R, Gagnon R, et al. Perspectives of obstetri- cians on labour and delivery after abdominal or laparoscopic myomec- tomy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2014, 36(2) : 128 - 132.
  • 7Nash K, Feinglass J, Zei C, et al. Robotic - assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs . Archives of Gynecology and Obstet- rios, 2012, 285(2) : 435 -440.
  • 8Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a revie of the data. Seminars in Perinatology, 2011,35(5) : 257 -261.
  • 9张庆霞,朱兰,刘珠凤,郎景和,孙大为,冷金花,樊庆泊.开腹与微创子宫肌瘤剔除术临床结局分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,24(4):278-281. 被引量:157
  • 10俞梅,朱兰.微创子宫肌瘤剔除术的变迁[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(10):929-931. 被引量:6

引证文献7

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部