摘要
目的观察和评价不同疗程1%卢立康唑乳膏治疗足癣的疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心、随机、双盲、阳性药物对照研究,将入选患者按照试验中心分层随机分成3组,包括卢立康唑短疗程组(外用l%卢立康唑乳膏,每日1次,共2周,后2周使用安慰剂)、卢立康唑长疗程组(外用1%卢立康唑乳膏,每日1次,共4周)、联苯苄唑对照组(外用1%联苯苄唑乳膏,每日1次,共4周)。开始用药后第2、3、4、6周评价临床和真菌学疗效。结果420例真菌镜检阳性的患者随机分成3组,每组140例,398例患者进入疗效分析。用药2周时,对照组、短疗程组、长疗程组临床有效率分别为29.29%、31.43%和35.00%(P〉0.05),真菌清除率分别为49.29%、58.57%和57.86%(P〉0.05);用药3周时,临床有效率分别为73.57%、78.57%和70.00%(P〉0.05);用药4周时,临床有效率分别为89.29%、91.43%和89.29%(P〉0.05),真菌清除率分别为80.00%、87.86%和85.00%(P〉0.05)。停药后2周,对照组、短疗程组、长疗程组的临床有效率分别是92.14%、92.86%和92.14%(P〉0.05),真菌清除率分别为80.71%、90.00%和89.29%(P〈o.05)。对照组局部不良反应发生率为o.71%,短疗程组为o,长疗程组为2.14%。结论1%卢立康唑乳膏外用治疗足癣安全有效,每日1次治疗2周与治疗4周的疗效相当。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different courses of luliconazole 1% cream in the treatment of tinea pedis. Methods A randomized, double-blind, multicenter controlled trial was conducted. According to a stratified randomization protocol, 420 patients positive for fungal elements on direct microscopy were equally and randomly divided into 3 groups: short-term group applying luliconazole 1% cream once daily for 2 weeks followed by placebo once daily for the next 2 weeks, long-term group applying luliconazole 1% cream once daily for 4 weeks, bifonazole group applying bifonazole 1% cream once daily for 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed in terms of mycological clearance and clinical response rates on week 2, 3, 4 and 6 after initiation of treatment. Statistical analysis was carried out by paired t test, analysis of variance, chi-square test and a nonparametric test. Results Finally, 398 patients were eligible for the efficacy analysis. The clinical response rate in the bifonazole group, short- term group and long-term group was 29.29%, 31.43% and 35.00% respectively on week 2 after initiation of treatment (P 〉 0.05), 73.57%, 78.57% and 70.00% respectively on week 3 (P 〉 0.05), 89.29%, 91.43% and 89.29% respectively on week 4 (P 〉 0.05), with the mycological clearance rate being 49.29%, 58.57% and 57.86% respectively on week 2 (P 〉 0.05), 80.00%, 87.86% and 85.00% respectively on week 4 (P 〉 0.05). Significant differences were observed on week 2 after the end of treatment in mycological clearance rate (80.71% in the bifonazole group vs. 90.00% in the short-term group vs. 89.29% in the long-term group, P 〈 0.05), but not in clinical response rate (92.14% in the bifonazole group vs. 92.86% in the short-term group vs. 92.14% in the long- term group, P 〉 0.05). The incidence rate of local adverse reactions was 0.71% in the bifonazole group, 0 in the short-term group and 2.14% in the long-term group. Conclusion Luliconazole 1% cream is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of tinea pedis, with the efficacy of 2-week once-daily regimen equivalent to that of 4-week once-daily regimen.
出处
《中华皮肤科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第7期453-456,共4页
Chinese Journal of Dermatology
关键词
卢立康唑
联苯苄唑
癣
脚
临床方案
随机对照试验
Luliconazole
Bilonazole
Tinea, pedis
Clinical protocols
Randomized controlled trials