期刊文献+

灭火救援基本公共服务均等化的路径选择 被引量:4

Research on route selection of fire-fighting basic public service equalization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过比较中美两起消防队"见火不救"事件,分析两国城乡差异化的灭火救援服务供给方式,论证了市场机制难以提供可靠的灭火救援服务,提出在加快推进新型城镇化的过程中,坚持政府主导、社会参与,慎用市场化工具,选择符合中国国情的灭火救援基本公共服务均等化实现路径。 The two fire companies watching house burning events happened in China and US are analyzed,and also the different supply methods of fire-fighting between the two countries,concludes that the market can’t supply the basic public service of fire-fighting stably,the reason of the problem is due to the government’ omission.During the great course of urbanization in China,the governments of different levels should take the duty of development of Fire Company,not only the career ones but also the volunteer fire companies,to improve the equalization of basic public services in rural areas.
作者 司戈
机构地区 公安部消防局
出处 《消防科学与技术》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第6期676-678,共3页 Fire Science and Technology
关键词 消防 灭火救援 基本公共服务 fire protection fire-fighting and rescue basic public service
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1封锡彬.民办消防队为啥处境尴尬[N].人民公安报,2005-08-16(1).
  • 2公安部消防局.中国消防年鉴2012[M].北京:中国人事出版社,2012.
  • 3NFPA.U.S.Fire department profile through 2010[R].2011.
  • 4United States Census Bureau.Local governments by type and state:2012[R].2012.
  • 5Dennis Davis.Our place in Europe[J].Fire,2010,(2):33-36.

共引文献5

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部