期刊文献+

单用或联用瑞波西汀治疗抑郁障碍的疗效与安全性研究 被引量:5

Efficacy and Safety of Reboxetine Alone or in Combination with Other Antidepressants for Depressive Disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨瑞波西汀单独应用或联合其他抗抑郁药治疗重症抑郁症障碍的疗效与安全性。方法:对194例重症抑郁发作患者,分为单用组和联用组,分别单独给予瑞波西汀或者瑞波西汀联用其他抗抑郁药(主要是选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)治疗,为期8周。应用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HARS)评估抗抑郁疗效,并观察不良反应的发生情况。结果:194例患者的HDRS评分、HARS评分均明显下降。单用组的HDRS减分率[(73.39±17.73)%]显著高于联用组[(62.71±29.33)%](P<0.01),有效率(90.8%)也显著高于联用组(78.8%)(P<0.05)。常见不良反应为头晕、口干和出汗,多为轻微和轻度,总体不良反应发生率为39.2%;未发生严重不良事件。结论:瑞波西汀单独及联合应用治疗抑郁症均疗效明显,且瑞波西汀单独应用疗效优于联合应用。瑞波西汀具有良好的耐受性。 OBJECTIVE:To explore the efficacy and safety of reboxetine alone or in combination with other antidepressants for major depressive disorder. METHODS:A total of 194 patients with major depressive order were assigned to receive reboxetine alone or in combination with other antidepressants (mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,SSRIs) for 8 weeks. Hamilton depression rating scale (17 items)(HDRS),Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS) were used to evaluate the efficacy of antide-pressant treatment,and the adverse drug reactions were also recorded. RESULTS:Both HDRS scores and the HARS scores in the 194 patients decreased significantly;however,the reduction rate of HDRS scores [(73.39 ± 17.73)% vs. (62.71 ± 29.33)%](P〈0.01) as well as the response rate(90.8% vs. 78.8%)(P〈0.05)in those patients treated with reboxetine alone were significantly higher than those treated with reboxetine plus other antidepressants. The most common adverse drug reactions included dizziness, dry month and sweating,mostly in mild or moderate degree. The rate of total adverse drug reactions was 39.2%. No serious ad-verse drug reaction case was found. CONCLUSIONS:Reboxetine used alone or in combination with other antidepressants show re-markable efficacy in the treatment of major depression;however,reboxetine used alone shows significantly better efficacy than its combination therapy. Moreover,reboxetine is well-tolerant.
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2014年第6期503-505,共3页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1O' Reardon JP, Brunswick D J, Amsterdam JD. Treat- ment-resistant depression in the age of serotonin: evolv- ing strategies [ J ]. Curr Opin Psyehia, 2000,13 ( 1 ) : 93-98.
  • 2Fava M, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, et al. Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to re- lieve depression (STAR*D) study [ J ]. Psychia Clin North Am, 2003,26 (2) : 457-494.
  • 3Gaynes BN, Rush A J, Trivedi MH, et al. The STAR*D study: treating depression in the real world[ J ]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2008,75 ( 1 ) : 57-66.
  • 4Rush AJ, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) : rationale and design [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 2004,25 ( 1 ) : 119-142.
  • 5Nelson JC , Mazure CM , Jatlow PI , et al. Combining norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibition mecha- nisms for treatment of depression: a double-blind, ran-domized study[J]. Biol Psychia, 2004,55 (3) : 296-300.
  • 6Rojo JE , Ros S, Agtiera L, et al. Combined antidepres- sant: clinical experience [J]. Acta Psychiatr Stand Suppl, 2005(112): 25-31,36.
  • 7Serretti A, Lucca A, Cusin C, et al. Associazione di re- boxetine nella depressione resistente a SSRI: effect of re- boxetine augmentation in SSRI resistant patients [J]. J Psy: Giorn di Psieopatol, 2001,7 ( 1 ) : 9-14.
  • 8Joffe RT. Substitution therapy in patients with major de- pression [ J ]. CNS Drugs, 1999,11 (3) : 175-180.
  • 9Hawley CJ , Sivakumaran T, Ochocki M, et al ministration therapy with reboxetine and serotonin Coad- speci- tic reuptake inhibitors in twenty-four patients with major depression [ J ]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2000, 9 ( S3 ) : 231.
  • 10Aguera LF, Rojo JE , Ros S, et al. Antidepressant com- binations : epidemiological considerations [J]. Aeta Psy- chiatr Scand, 2005 (112) : 7-10,36.

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部