期刊文献+

基于三角模糊数的测试性分配方法 被引量:4

Method of Testability Allocation Based on Triangular Fuzzy Numbers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在考虑多因素影响的测试性分配中,需要专家通过两两比较来确定诸因素的相对重要性.然而由于人们的判断具有模糊性和不确定性,故在构造比较判断矩阵时所给出的判断往往不是确定的数值.针对这一问题,本文提出基于三角模糊数的测试性分配方法.该方法用三角模糊数表示专家评判数值范围,考虑人判断的模糊性,将无弹性的硬指标转化成模糊的软指标,建立基于三角模糊数的结构模型,同时结合层次分析(APH)方法进行指标权重的确定,由得到的权重进行测试性指标的分配.最后结合实例对本方法进行应用研究,应用结果验证了此方法的可行性. Considering multiple factors that affect the distribution of the test, experts are needed through pairwise comparison to determine the relative importance of the factors. However, due to the people's judg- ment of fuzziness and uncertainty, judgment in the structural comparison judgment matrix is often not given a value determined. To this problem, proposed a testability allocation method based on triangular fuzzy num- bers. The method using triangular numbers to represent the numerical range of expert judgment, considering the fuzzy judgment, change inelastic hard index into fuzzy soft index, establish a structural model based on triangular fuzzy numbers, combined with the analytic hierarchy process (APH) to determine the index weight method, distribution of test indexes obtained by gaining weight. Finally, an example application study of this paper, the application results proved the feasibility of this method.
出处 《测试技术学报》 2014年第4期293-298,共6页 Journal of Test and Measurement Technology
基金 总装武器装备预研基金项目(9140A27020212JBZ4311)
关键词 测试性分配 三角模糊数 层次分析法 故障检测率 判断矩阵 testability allocation triangular fuzzy numbers analytic hierarchy process fault detection rate judgment matrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1田仲.测试性分配和预计[J].北京航空航天大学学报,1995,21(4):13-17. 被引量:7
  • 2黄莺,李慧民,袁春燕.基于模糊综合评判理论的索赔风险系统实用研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,38(6):882-887. 被引量:7
  • 3JGJ/T77-2003,施工企业安全生产评价标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
  • 4FANG D P,XIE F, H UANG XY, et al. Factor analysis-based studies on construction workplace safety management in China [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004,22:43-49.
  • 5TAM C M,ZENG S X,ENG Z M. Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China [J]. Safety Science, 2004,42:569-586.
  • 6METIN Dagdeviren, IHSAN Yuksel. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behaviorbased safety management [J]. Information Sciences, 2008,178 : 1717-1733.
  • 7Konak A,Coit D W, Smith A E. Multi objectiveOptimization Using Genetic Algorithms: a Tutorial[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2006,91(9):992-1007.
  • 8Jia X P,Zhang T Z,Wang F,et al. Multi--objectiveModeling and Optimization for Cleaner ProductionProcesses[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006,14:146-151.
  • 9Rajesh J K,Gupta S K,Rangaiah G P,et al. Multi--oh-jeetive Optimization of Industrial Hydrogen Plants[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 200l, 56 (3): 999-1010.
  • 10Robert B, Brent R, Paul C. A Multi--objective Opti-mization Approach to Urban School Bus Routing:Formulation and Solution Method[J]. Transporta-tion Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 1995,29(2):107-123.

共引文献98

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部