期刊文献+

产权差异、董事会特征与公司绩效 被引量:3

Property differences,Board Characteristics and Corporate Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以我国上市公司为研究样本,区分企业性质,实证检验了不同董事会特征对企业绩效的影响。本文研究发现,董事长没有兼任总经理,董事会规模越大,薪酬越高,开会次数较多和独立董事越多,公司的绩效也越好;可是董事会持股比例却没有显著影响公司绩效。在国有企业中,董事会规模与公司绩效之间呈显著负相关关系,说明董事会规模太大对企业的绩效有显著的负面影响。在非国有企业中,董事会规模较小,开会次数较多,独立董事比例和董事成员薪酬较高,能够对公司的绩效产生显著的影响;但是二职合一却降低了公司绩效。研究结论表明,不同的企业产权制度下董事会特征对公司绩效的影响存在较大差异。本研究不仅丰富了公司绩效领域的文献,而且对董事会的构成特征也有一定借鉴意义。 In this paper, China's listed companies as samples, distinguishing corporate nature, empirical tests of different board characteristics impact on firm performance. This study found no concurrently general manager, chairman of the board larger, higher salaries, meetings more frequently and more independent directors, the company ' s performance is also better; stake, but the Board did not significantly affect the company ' s performance. State-owned enterprises, between board size and firm performance was a significant negative correlation, indicating that the board size is too large for the company ' s performance has a significant negative impact. In the non-state-owned enterprises, smaller board, meeting more frequently, the proportion of independent directors and board members of the higher remuneration to the company's performance have a significant impact; But two rank-one has reduced the corporate performance. Conclusion of the study show that different characteristics of enterprise property right system board impact on corporate performance are quite different. This study not only enrich the corporate performance literature in the field, but also on the composition of the Board of Directors also has some characteristics of reference.
出处 《河南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期71-76,123,共6页 Henan Social Sciences
基金 2013年度江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“后股改时代董事会特征与公司绩效关系研究--基于产权属性、行业竞争差异的视角”(2013SJD630132)
关键词 产权差异 董事会特征 公司绩效 Property differences Board Characteristics Corporate Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1Borokhovich, Panino and Trapani, Outside Directors and CEO Selection.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), pp. 337--355.
  • 2Hermalin, Weisbach, The Determinants of Board Composition. Rand Journal of Economics 19 (1988), pp. 589-606.
  • 3Hermalin, Weisbach, The Effects of Board Composition and Directors Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20 (1992), pp. 101--112.
  • 4Jensen and Murphy, Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentive. Journad of Politicial Economy, 3 (1990), pp. 225--264.
  • 5Lipton, Lorsch, A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48. no. 1, 1992, pp. 59--77.
  • 6Wu, Yili, Honey, I Shrunk the Board, Working Paper, 2000, University of Chicago.
  • 7Yermack, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Jounud of Financial Economis, 40(1996), pp. 185--211.
  • 8Barnhart, S. W. 1998. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review. Vol. 33. 1-16.
  • 9Baysinger, B. D., and H.N. Butler. 1985. Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Finance. Vol. 1.
  • 10Borokhovich, K.A., R. Parrino, and T. Trapani. 1996. Outside Directors and CEO Selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 31. 337-355.

共引文献543

同被引文献40

  • 1游春.股权激励对董事会及TMT团队的经营绩效差异的研究——基于中小企业板上市公司面板数据的分析[J].管理学家(学术版),2008(6):497-508. 被引量:3
  • 2袁萍,刘士余,高峰.关于中国上市公司董事会、监事会与公司业绩的研究[J].金融研究,2006(6):23-32. 被引量:85
  • 3牛建波,李胜楠.董事报酬影响企业价值吗?——基于我国民营上市公司面板数据的比较研究[J].经济管理,2006,32(23):33-37. 被引量:5
  • 4YERMACK D. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors [ J ]. Journal of financial economics, 1996(40) :185-211.
  • 5EISENBERG T, SUNDGREN S, WELLS M. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms [ J ]. Journal of financial economics, 1998 ( 48 ) : 35-54.
  • 6BROWN W, MALONEY M. Exit, voice and the role of cor- porate directors: evidence from acquisition performance [ M ]. Working paper, Claremont Mckenna Collene, 1999.
  • 7COLES J L, DANIEL N D, NAVEEN L. Boards: does one size fit all? [ J ]. Journal of financial economics, 2008 (87) :329-356.
  • 8GOYAL V K, PARK C W. Board leader ship structure and CEO turnover [ J ]. Journal of corporate finance, 2002 ( 8 ) : 49-66.
  • 9张国源.上市公司董事会特征与业绩关系的实证研究[D].济南:山东大学,2010[2015-04-27].http://www.cnki. net/kcms/detail/detail, aspx? dbcode = CMFD&db Name = CMFD2OI0&FileName = 2010102797. nh&v = &ui d = WEEvREcwS1JHSldSdnQ1Y1AyNnc4Mkgl cmYwbE9ocG srY2 FxcUYrTOFSbnEvaVk3 bGdXWm0OYOF3 TEdxNWwwd W93PT0 = $ 9A4hF_YAuvQ5obgVAqNKPCYcEjKensW4 IOMovwHtwkF4VYPoHbKxJw ! !.
  • 10闫等旗.股权分置改革前后上市公司治理与企业绩效关系的实证研究[D].广州:暨南大学,2014[2015-06-20].http://www.cnki.Bet/kems/detail/detml.aspx?dbcode:CMFD&dbName=CMFD2015&FileName=1015001886.nh&v=&uid=WEEvREewSlJHSldSdnQlYlAyNnc4MkglcmYwbE90cGsrY2FxcUYrTOFSbnEvaVk3bGdXWin00YOF3TEdxNWwwdW93PT0=$9~hF5AuvQ50bgVAqNKPCYcEjKensW4IQMovwHtwkF4VYPoHbKxJw!!.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部